London, 12 February 2025 | GATPM

On the 112th anniversary of the Proclamation of Tibet’s Independence, the Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities (GATPM) calls on Britain and China to address Tibet’s unresolved status and ongoing human rights violations.

Tsering Passang, Founder & Chair of GATPM, stated:

“13th February 2025 marks the 112th anniversary of the Proclamation of Tibet’s Independence by the Great 13th Dalai Lama, following the expulsion of Qing imperial forces. This reaffirmed Tibet’s sovereign status – one that remained intact until Communist China’s illegal invasion in 1950. For Tibetans worldwide, this historic proclamation remains a cornerstone of their enduring struggle for freedom and international recognition.

We urge British Foreign Secretary David Lammy to raise Tibet and the Chinese government’s ongoing human rights violations during his meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in London. We also hope that Secretary Lammy recalls GATPM’s policy submission – Strategic and Security Implications for the UK in the Indo-Pacific Region: A Policy Proposal on Tibet. A key recommendation in this proposal is the strategic necessity of restoring Tibet as a buffer state between India and China to ensure long-term peace and stability in the region, a point strongly reinforced in the recent joint Op-Ed by Lord Alton and Chris Law MP, ‘The UK has a strategic and moral imperative to support Tibet,’ published in PoliticsHome.com last month.

The timing of Minister Wang Yi’s visit to London on this significant anniversary underscores Tibet’s unresolved status. His meeting with Foreign Secretary Lammy also takes place against the backdrop of Britain’s historical engagements with Tibet during the British India era, including the 1904 Younghusband Expedition and subsequent treaties that shaped Tibet’s diplomatic standing. As senior British and Chinese diplomats convene, it is imperative that Tibet’s rightful place in history, its strategic significance, and the ongoing plight of the Tibetan people remain firmly on the agenda.”

With growing global concerns over China’s increasing assertiveness, the UK has a responsibility to uphold democratic values and advocate for Tibet’s rightful status. The Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities urges the British government to reaffirm its commitment to human rights and international law by addressing Tibet’s past, present, and future.

13th February 1913 – 13th February 2025: Why Tibetans Commemorate the 112th Anniversary of the Proclamation of Tibet’s Independence?

In his Proclamation of the Tibetan Independence, on 13^th February 1913, His Holiness the Great XIII Dalai Lama, declared: “Tibet is a country with rich natural resources; but it is not scientifically advanced like other lands. We are a small, religious, and independent nation. To keep up with the rest of the world, we must defend our country. In view of past invasions by foreigners, our people may have to face certain difficulties, which they must disregard. To safeguard and maintain the independence of our country, one and all should voluntarily work hard. Our subject citizens residing near the borders should be alert and keep the government informed by special messenger of any suspicious developments. Our subjects must not create major clashes between two nations because of minor incidents.”

The proclamation was made after the Great Thirteenth Dalai Lama returned to Tibet from exile in India, in January 1913. At the time of the Dalai Lama’s return to his landlocked Tibetan Kingdom, the Manchu dynasty had been dissolved in the course of the Chinese revolution. For nearly forty years afterwards, Tibetans enjoyed self-rule – only for it to come to an end in 1949, after Communist China’s Mao Tsetung declared “peaceful liberation” of Tibetans from the foreign imperialists.

For Tibetans, Mao’s declaration was not only a brutal attack on Buddhist religion and the Tibetan culture but an illegal occupation of their peaceful nation by the giant neighbour, People’s Republic of China. The Tibetan people have a proud history of independence with the successive Dalai Lamas enjoying spiritual patronage over Mongols and Chinese emperors.

Just as it did more than a thousand years ago, today, a doring (pillar) stands outside the Jokhang Temple in Lhasa, Tibet’s capital city. On its stone sides the Tibet-China Treaty of 821-822 AD is carved, signifying the legacy of a free and independent Tibet.

“Tibetans shall be happy in the land of Tibet, and Chinese shall be happy in the land of China,” reads a key text in the treaty, clearly describing the borders between Tibet and China.

For those who haven’t read the Proclamation of Independence Issued by the Great XIII Dalai Lama, please see below:

PROCLAMATION ISSUED BY H.H. THE DALAI LAMA XIII, ON THE EIGHTH DAY OF THE FIRST MONTH OF THE WATER-OX YEAR (1913)

Translation of the Tibetan Text

“I, the Dalai Lama, most omniscient possessor of the Buddhist faith, whose title was conferred by the Lord Buddha’s command from the glorious land of India, speak to you as follows:

I am speaking to all classes of Tibetan people. Lord Buddha, from the glorious country of India, prophesied that the reincarnations of Avalokitesvara, through successive rulers from the early religious kings to the present day, would look after the welfare of Tibet.

During the time of Genghis Khan and Altan Khan of the Mongols, the Ming dynasty of the Chinese, and the Ch’ing Dynasty of the Manchus, Tibet and China cooperated on the basis of benefactor and priest relationship. A few years ago, the Chinese authorities in Szechuan and Yunnan endeavored to colonize our territory. They brought large numbers of troops into central Tibet on the pretext of policing the trade marts. I, therefore, left Lhasa with my ministers for the Indo-Tibetan border, hoping to clarify to the Manchu emperor by wire that the existing relationship between Tibet and China had been that of patron and priest and had not been based on the subordination of one to the other. There was no other choice for me but to cross the border, because Chinese troops were following with the intention of taking me alive or dead.

On my arrival in India, I dispatched several telegrams to the Emperor; but his reply to my demands was delayed by corrupt officials at Peking. Meanwhile, the Manchu empire collapsed. The Tibetans were encouraged to expel the Chinese from central Tibet. I, too, returned safely to my rightful and sacred country, and I am now in the course of driving out the remnants of Chinese troops from DoKham in Eastern Tibet. Now, the Chinese intention of colonizing Tibet under the patron-priest relationship has faded like a rainbow in the sky. Having once again achieved for ourselves a period of happiness and peace, I have now allotted to all of you the following duties to be carried out without negligence:

1. Peace and happiness in this world can only be maintained by preserving the faith of Buddhism. It is, therefore, essential to preserve all Buddhist institutions in Tibet, such as the Jokhang temple and Ramoche in Lhasa, Samye, and Traduk in southern Tibet, and the three great monasteries, etc.
2. The various Buddhist sects in Tibet should be kept in a distinct and pure form. Buddhism should be taught, learned, and meditated upon properly. Except for special persons, the administrators of monasteries are forbidden to trade, loan money, deal in any kind of livestock, and/or subjugate another’s subjects.
3. The Tibetan government’s civil and military officials, when collecting taxes or dealing with their subject citizens, should carry out their duties with fair and honest judgment so as to benefit the government without hurting the interests of the subject citizens. Some of the central government officials posted at Ngari Korsum in western Tibet, and Do Kham in eastern Tibet, are coercing their subject citizens to purchase commercial goods at high prices and have imposed transportation rights exceeding the limit permitted by the government. Houses, properties and lands belonging to subject citizens have been confiscated on the pretext of minor breaches of the law. Furthermore, the amputation of citizens’ limbs has been carried out as a form of punishment. Henceforth, such severe punishments are forbidden.
4. Tibet is a country with rich natural resources; but it is not scientifically advanced like other lands. We are a small, religious, and independent nation. To keep up with the rest of the world, we must defend our country. In view of past invasions by foreigners, our people may have to face certain difficulties, which they must disregard. To safeguard and maintain the independence of our country, one and all should voluntarily work hard. Our subject citizens residing near the borders should be alert and keep the government informed by special messenger of any suspicious developments. Our subjects must not create major clashes between two nations because of minor incidents.
5. Tibet, although thinly populated, is an extensive country. Some local officials and landholders are jealously obstructing other people from developing vacant lands, even though they are not doing so themselves. People with such intentions are enemies of the State and our progress. From now on, no one is allowed to obstruct anyone else from cultivating whatever vacant lands are available. Land taxes will not be collected until three years have passed; after that the land cultivator will have to pay taxes to the government and to the landlord every year, proportionate to the rent. The land will belong to the cultivator.

Your duties to the government and to the people will have been achieved when you have executed all that I have said here. This letter must be posted and proclaimed in every district of Tibet, and a copy kept in the records of the offices in every district.

From the Potala Palace.

(Seal of the Dalai Lama)”

Source (and further reading): Tibet: A Political History, Tsepon W.D. Shagapda, New Haven, 1967, pp. 246-248.

By Tsering Passang First published in Uyghur Times on 21st January 2025

I have long observed the complexities of global leadership and the impact of U.S. policies on international affairs. With President Donald Trump’s decisive victory in the November 2024 presidential election, coupled with Republican control of the U.S. Congress, there is no doubt that his leadership will continue to leave an indelible mark on the world stage. While I respect the democratic process that brought President Trump back into the White House, it is essential to reflect on some of his decisions and their implications for global peace and human dignity.

President Trump’s decision to withdraw U.S. participation from the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the Paris Climate Accord remains deeply regrettable. The United States, as a founding member of the United Nations in 1945, has historically played a pivotal role in fostering international cooperation and addressing global challenges. The WHO, despite its flaws, remains a critical institution in addressing pandemics and ensuring global health security. Similarly, the Paris Climate Accord represents a collective commitment to combating climate change — an existential threat to humanity. By stepping away from these multilateral efforts, the U.S. risks ceding its leadership role at a time when global challenges demand unified action.

One of the most significant appointments of President Trump’s new administration is Senator Marco Rubio as the Secretary of State. This decision is a welcome one, as Rubio’s firm stance on China aligns with the urgent need to address Beijing’s growing authoritarianism and human rights abuses. As a longstanding critic of the Chinese regime’s oppressive policies, Rubio’s leadership at the State Department signals a robust U.S. commitment to confronting China’s challenges to global stability and supporting those who suffer under its brutal regime. This appointment is a timely and strategic move that reflects President Trump’s recognition of the gravity of the situation and the need for experienced and principled leadership in global diplomacy.

Authoritarian regimes, such as those in China and Russia, continue to challenge the global peace order, undermine democracy, and violate human dignity. China’s continued oppression of Tibetans, Uyghurs, Southern Mongolians, Hongkongers, and other persecuted minorities, along with its increasingly aggressive stance on Taiwan, poses a significant threat to international stability. Russia’s actions, from its ongoing war in Ukraine to its suppression of dissent at home, further underscore the need for strong, principled leadership from democratic nations. The United States, with its unparalleled influence, must lead by example and rally the global community to stand against such injustices.

President Trump’s first term in office made notable contributions to supporting human rights through the signing of critical U.S. laws on Tibet, Uyghurs, and other persecuted communities. These legislative actions have provided much-needed support and recognition for those enduring severe repression under authoritarian regimes. By enacting these measures, President Trump has sent a clear message of solidarity with oppressed peoples and a commitment to confronting human rights abuses.

Despite these concerns, there are reasons for optimism as we look ahead to President Trump’s leadership in his second term. He has repeatedly expressed his determination to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict, a step in the right direction to save human lives, and this must be welcomed. His administration’s efforts in the Middle East, particularly the Abraham Accords, have contributed to historic strides toward peace and cooperation in a region long marred by conflict. These achievements highlight the potential for pragmatic diplomacy and bold initiatives to foster greater understanding and collaboration among nations.

It is vital, however, that the Trump administration adopts a multilateral approach to address global challenges. Strengthening partnerships with allies in the UK, Europe, Australia and Asia — including India, Japan, Taiwan and others — will be essential in countering disinformation campaigns, protecting free speech, and upholding democratic values. The collective strength of these alliances can serve as a powerful force against the rising tide of authoritarianism and threats to the international rules-based order.

As President Trump begins this new chapter of his presidency, I hope his administration will prioritise the betterment of humanity not only within the United States but across the globe. The U.S. has a unique responsibility to champion democracy, uphold human rights, and combat authoritarianism. By embracing these values and working with international partners, President Trump has the opportunity to solidify his legacy as a leader who advanced global peace and prosperity.

In a world fraught with challenges, from climate change to rising authoritarianism, the need for visionary leadership has never been greater. I urge President Trump and his administration to seize this moment to reaffirm America’s commitment to a just and equitable world order, one that uplifts the oppressed and ensures a brighter future for generations to come.

Tsering Passang is founder and chair of the UK-based Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities. Tsering’s blog: www.Tsamtruk.com 

By Tsering Passang

The growing influence of China on Western cultural institutions is a matter of profound concern, especially for those who cherish historical integrity and the preservation of cultural identities. In 2024, several prominent European museums, such as the Musée du quai Branly and Musée Guimet in Paris, adopted terms like “Xizang” or “Himalayan World” in place of Tibet, aligning their language with Beijing’s political agenda. This capitulation undermines Tibet’s rightful identity and sets a dangerous precedent for cultural institutions worldwide.

Recognising this troubling trend, I sought to raise awareness among a British audience, cautioning that it is only a matter of time before similar pressures extend to the UK. On 23rd September 2024, I submitted the letter below to the editor of a British newspaper. It followed my earlier article, The Influence of Beijing on Western Cultural Institutions: The Case of Tibet’s Renaming and Communist China’s Global Narrative Push, which the same publication had declined to print. My aim was to alert readers in the UK to the imminent threat of China’s narrative manipulation infiltrating the country’s cultural spaces. Unfortunately, the letter was not published either, leading me to share my concerns directly on my blog.

Coincidentally, just two days later, on 25th September, the British Museum opened its Silk Roads Exhibition, a showcase running until 23rd February 2025. Although I had no prior knowledge of this exhibition, its timing underscored the urgency of my warnings. When I visited the exhibition in November, I observed the usage of terms like “Tibet” alongside “Xizang Autonomous Region,” reflecting Beijing’s narratives. Such language choices have far-reaching geopolitical implications and misrepresent the region’s historical and cultural context.

The Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities, along with the Tibetan Community in Britain, has since made formal representations to the British Museum authorities. We hope that the UK’s premier cultural institutions will recognise the seriousness of this issue and respond to the concerns raised by Tibetan groups.

Below is the letter I submitted, encapsulating the urgency of protecting historical truth and resisting political coercion in our cultural institutions.

Recent actions by European museums, such as the Musée du quai Branly and Musée Guimet in Paris, are deeply concerning. Their decision to use “Xizang” instead of Tibet aligns with Beijing’s political agenda and signals China’s growing influence over Western cultural institutions. This capitulation to Chinese pressure undermines Tibet’s rightful identity and poses a serious threat to global historical integrity.

The term “Xizang,” aggressively promoted by China, reinforces Beijing’s false sovereignty claims over Tibet. Its adoption by respected museums is part of China’s broader campaign to control the narrative surrounding Tibet’s history, culture, and political status. Recently launched Xizang International Communication Centre further amplifies China’s propaganda efforts, aimed at reshaping global perceptions to suit its agenda.

By using “Xizang,” these institutions are complicit in erasing Tibet’s unique cultural and historical legacy, effectively endorsing China’s occupation. This raises urgent questions about how far Europe’s cultural institutions are willing to bend to political pressure. Such a dangerous precedent could easily spread to UK museums, further distorting historical truth. Notably, Great Britain and Tibet shared diplomatic ties long before the rise of Communist China, with London establishing trade missions in Tibet in 1904 and welcoming Tibetan students for education in the UK in 1913.

I strongly urge UK cultural institutions and stakeholders to resist China’s influence, protect historical accuracy, and uphold the values of independence and integrity. Allowing Beijing’s narrative to dominate would betray the cultural and historical truths these institutions are entrusted to preserve. Meanwhile, Tibetans in occupied Tibet continue to face repression, including denial of basic human rights such as freedom of religion and speech.

Tsering Passang
Founder and Chair, Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities

Tibetans and Tibet groups worldwide have released a joint press statement (see below) in response to the devastating 7.1 magnitude earthquake that struck Tibet, claiming at least 126 lives and injuring over 188. The Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities (GATPM) mourns this tragic loss of life and pays tribute to the rescuers, including individual Tibetans across the Tibetan plateau, who have shown unwavering support and solidarity with the victims.

In the Tibetan diaspora, urgent prayer meetings were held in local communities, including in London, accompanied by heartfelt messages from religious and political leaders. GATPM commends the continued use of the rightful name “Tibet” by international media outlets, in defiance of the Chinese Government’s propaganda campaign promoting the term “Xizang.”

At this difficult time, Tibetans need the world’s support and solidarity. Despite this natural calamity, Tibetans remain resilient and steadfast in their resistance against Communist China’s illegal occupation of Tibet — a regime responsible for the deaths of over a million Tibetans, including children, women, and Buddhist monks and nuns.

Tibet Quake Victims Need Help, Not Harm

Tibetans and Tibet organisations around the world are deeply saddened by the devastating earthquake [1] that struck Chinese-occupied Tibet on 7 January 2025 [2]. 

At this critical moment, the safety and welfare of those affected by the earthquake must be given full priority. To this end, we call on world governments to provide support and oversight to all of China’s disaster relief efforts in order to ensure impacted Tibetan communities receive the required aid and assistance. They must also ensure the Chinese government does not use its earthquake response as a pretext to further its colonial policies in Tibet as it did following the 2010 earthquake in Jyekundo སྐྱེ་དགུ་མདོ། in Yushul ཡུས་ཤུལ། in the eastern Tibetan province of Kham ཁམས། [3]. They should also impress upon Beijing that it must not punish Tibetans who share information or attempt to contact family and friends about the impact of the earthquake or its response.

We further call on the international community – especially governments and media organisations – to use Tibetan place names in any statements or reporting, both as a matter of historical accuracy and respect for the cultural identity of the Tibetan people. This includes, for example, using Shigatse instead of the Chinese name Xigaze, and Tibet instead of the Chinese name Xizang. The Chinese government is engaged in a campaign to literally erase the word Tibet from the map in an effort to reduce recognition of Tibet as an entity separate from China [4].

The earthquake has exacerbated the existing vulnerabilities of the Tibetan people, who have suffered for more than seven decades under China’s violent occupation of their nation. Tibet advocacy groups worldwide will continue to do everything in our power to fight for the fundamental rights and dignity of the Tibetan people and for the restoration of freedom in Tibet.

Notes To Editor: 

1. The epicentre was recorded in Tibet’s Tsogo མཚོ་སྒོ། township (Chinese: 措果 Cuoguo) in Dingri དིང་རི། county (Chinese: 定日 Ding ri) in Shigatse གཞིས་ཀ་རྩེ། prefecture (Chinese: 日喀则 Rikaze). Chinese state media says at least 126 people have died, more than 188 have been injured, and about 1,000 houses were damaged in the quake https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jan/07/tibet-earthquake-holy-city-of-shigatse-nepal-magnitude-quake 

For further context, Shigatse is also home to Tashi Lhunpo Monastery, the seat of the Panchen Lama, Gedhun Choekyi Nyima, who was kidnapped by China in 1995 at the age of 6 years old. The Chinese government has since groomed and promoted a fake Panchen Lama in an effort to co-opt Tibetan Buddhism. The city is considered a holy city and holds immense religious significance to the Tibetan people. 

2. The U.S. Geological Survey said the earthquake measured magnitude 7.1 and was relatively shallow at a depth of about 10 kilometers (6 miles) https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000pi9w/executive
3. Jyekundo སྐྱེ་དགུ་མདོ། is in Yushul ཡུས་ཤུལ། in the eastern Tibetan Province of Kham ཁམས། (Chinese: 玉树 Yushu Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, 青海 Qinghai Province) See: China: Yushu Is a Tibetan Town Rebuilt in Beijing’s Image, Time, 14 April, 2015 https://time.com/3820739/yushu-jyekundo-earthquake-china-tibet/
4. See, for example, Tibet Must Stand!, Tsering Shakya, SOAS China Institute, https://blogs.soas.ac.uk/china-institute/2024/12/11/tibet-must-stand/ and China’s external propaganda on Tibet: Erasing Tibet to ‘tell a good Chinese story,’ International Campaign for Tibet, https://savetibet.org/chinas-external-propaganda-on-tibet
5. His Holiness the Dalai Lama has commented on the earthquake, stating: “I am deeply saddened to learn of the devastating earthquake that struck Dingri in Tibet and the surrounding regions this morning. It has caused the tragic loss of many lives, numerous injuries, and extensive destruction to homes and property. I offer my prayers for those who have lost their lives and extend my wishes for a swift recovery to all who have been injured.” https://www.dalailama.com/news/his-holiness-the-dalai-lama-expresses-deep-sadness-over-the-earthquake-in-tibet 

For more information, please contact:
 

Tsering Passang (first published 6th January 2025 in NepalAaja)

Nepal stands at a pivotal moment in its history, navigating the delicate balance between its geopolitical interests and its profound historical and cultural ties with Tibet. From centuries-old bonds forged through spiritual and cultural exchanges to contemporary challenges shaped by regional power dynamics, Nepal’s relationship with Tibet reflects a unique legacy of mutual respect and shared heritage.

As the birthplace of Lord Buddha and a land of deep spiritual significance, Nepal holds a special place in the hearts of millions of Tibetans, including His Holiness the Dalai Lama, a Nobel Peace Laureate and globally respected moral leader. However, China’s pressure to limit Nepal’s engagement with Tibetan refugees and deny visits from revered Tibetan figures raises critical questions about Nepal’s commitment to its constitutional principles of equality, freedom, and sovereignty.

This article explores Nepal’s role in safeguarding Tibetan heritage, the invaluable contributions of Tibetan refugees to Nepalese society, and the broader implications of its foreign policy decisions. By addressing these issues, Nepal has the opportunity to reaffirm its position as a beacon of peace, democracy, and cultural harmony in the Himalayan region.

Nepal’s Constitutional Commitments and Beliefs

The Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal’s constitution, born from the nation’s arduous journey toward democracy, enshrines principles of equality, freedom, and sovereignty. These values resonate deeply with Nepalese people, who have overcome decades of autocracy and political upheaval. It is vital that Nepal’s actions on the global stage reflect these democratic ideals, especially in matters concerning vulnerable groups such as Tibetan refugees.

If the proposed visit to Nepal by the China-backed Panchen Lama, Gyancain Norbu – a figure regarded by Tibetans in exile as a political instrument rather than a spiritual leader – proceeds, it underscores Kathmandu’s disregard for maintaining religious neutrality. While this decision may be justified as pragmatic given Nepal’s geopolitical realities, it also calls for deeper reflection on Nepal’s responsibilities towards its indigenous Buddhist community, Tibetan refugees, and the historical bonds that have long united the Tibetan and Nepali peoples.

Historical Bonds Between Tibet and Nepal

Nepal’s accession to the United Nations in 1955 was facilitated, in part, by its foreign treaty with Tibet, established long before China’s occupation of Tibet in 1950. This treaty underscored mutual recognition and cooperation, symbolising a profound connection between these Himalayan neighbours. The ties between Tibet and Nepal extend beyond political agreements, permeating cultural, spiritual, and economic domains.

Lumbini, the birthplace of Lord Buddha, is a site of immense spiritual significance for both Tibetans and Nepalese. Tibetan Buddhism has played a crucial role in preserving and promoting Nepal’s Buddhist heritage, fostering a shared cultural identity that transcends political boundaries. It is imperative that contemporary geopolitical considerations do not overshadow this historical and spiritual legacy.

Furthermore, Nepal must resist Beijing’s pressure to use the term “Xizang” in place of “Tibet.” Such language, dictated by China, erases the authentic historical relationship between the two nations and reflects Beijing’s political agenda rather than Nepal’s independent diplomatic stance. Honouring the term “Tibet” reaffirms Nepal’s acknowledgment of the cultural and historical bonds that transcend political impositions.

Nepal’s Geopolitical Balancing Act

Nepal’s geographic and strategic position places it at the heart of power dynamics between India and China. While Nepal’s growing ties with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) might seem advantageous, they must be tempered with the understanding that Nepal’s sovereignty and democratic values are paramount. Historical ties with Tibet remind Nepal that its foreign policy should balance immediate gains with enduring relationships and ethical obligations.

The proposed visit of the Beijing-appointed Panchen Lama, presented as a religious engagement, is laden with political implications, underscoring China’s efforts to dominate Tibetan Buddhism. By permitting such a visit, Nepal risks being perceived as complicit in the Chinese Communist Party’s agenda to assert authority over Tibetan spirituality and culture. While the decision may seem pragmatic, it also highlights the pressing need to safeguard Tibetan heritage and identity.

Additionally, the stature of His Holiness the Dalai Lama must not be overlooked. As a champion of peace, interfaith dialogue, and non-violence, the Dalai Lama commands profound global respect. Nepal must resist China’s pressure to bar the Dalai Lama from visiting historical religious sites, ensuring that its policies reflect spiritual and cultural harmony rather than political expediency.

Contributions of Tibetan Refugees to Nepalese Society

Tibetan refugees in Nepal have enriched the nation’s social and economic fabric. Tibetan-run businesses, particularly in carpet weaving and artisanal crafts, have created jobs and positioned Nepal as a global leader in high-quality handmade carpets. Tibetan Buddhist institutions, meanwhile, have bolstered Nepal’s spiritual landscape, attracting pilgrims and tourists and fostering a synergy between economic and cultural growth.

In education, Tibetan schools have demonstrated resilience and excellence, benefiting both Tibetan and Nepalese students. Tibetan refugee communities exemplify self-reliance and community spirit, contributing significantly to Nepal’s development.

The Role of Civil Society and Academia

Nepal’s civil society, academia, human rights advocates, and journalists have championed democracy and freedom. These groups must now extend their solidarity to Tibetan refugees, advocating for policies that protect their rights and dignity. In a region where democratic values are under siege, Nepal has the opportunity to stand as a beacon of hope by fostering inclusivity and safeguarding minority rights.

Nepal’s own struggle for freedom and democracy should inspire solidarity with Tibetans, whose aspirations for dignity and autonomy mirror those of the Nepalese people. Supporting Tibetan refugees is not only an act of compassion but also a reaffirmation of Nepal’s democratic principles.

Moving Forward: A Call for Balanced Diplomacy

Nepal must navigate its relationships with powerful neighbours like China and India with historical continuity and moral clarity. While strategic partnerships are necessary, they must not overshadow Nepal’s enduring bonds with Tibet. The 7th-century union of Tibetan King Songtsen Gampo and Nepalese Princess Bhrikuti exemplifies the deep ties between the two peoples, symbolising harmony and collaboration.

Nepal’s policymakers should adopt a balanced approach that respects its historical ties with Tibet, protects the well-being of Tibetan refugees, and upholds Nepal’s sovereignty and neutrality. Civil society and non-state actors must also champion the rights of Tibetan refugees, recognising their contributions to Nepal’s diversity and prosperity.

Conclusion

Nepal stands at a crossroads. Its decisions will shape its international standing and legacy as a defender of human rights and democracy. By honouring its historical ties with Tibet and supporting Tibetan refugees, Nepal can reaffirm its commitment to the principles enshrined in its constitution.

As a Tibetan born in Nepal, I remain hopeful that the land which provided my family refuge will continue to uphold its legacy of compassion and justice. Together, Nepalese and Tibetan communities can build a future rooted in mutual respect, shared heritage, and a collective pursuit of peace and dignity.

Tsering Passang is the founder and chair of the UK-based Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities (GATPM).

Useful Link

Nepal Aaja

London, 24th December 2024 / GATPM

The Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities (GATPM) strongly condemns the recent sanctions imposed by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) on human rights organisations and activists, including the Canada Tibet Committee (CTC) and the Uyghur Rights Advocacy Project (URAP). These unjust sanctions are yet another tactic by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to intimidate and silence defenders of truth, justice, and human rights.

Since its rise to power in 1949, the CCP under Mao Tsetung and his successors have relentlessly pursued policies of oppression, cultural erasure, and genocide. In Tibet, millions have suffered under decades of brutal occupation, with over a million lives lost to state violence, cultural destruction, and forced assimilation. The Tibetan language, spiritual traditions, and national identity have been systematically attacked, while historical narratives are being rewritten to eradicate Tibet’s independent history. Similarly, in East Turkestan (Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region), the Uyghur people face unspeakable atrocities, including mass detentions, forced labour, and what the world increasingly recognises as an ongoing genocide.

The PRC’s recent sanctions on CTC and URAP expose the regime’s intolerance of legitimate international advocacy. The Canada Tibet Committee, a voice for peaceful and democratic engagement in line with His Holiness the Dalai Lama’s Middle Way Approach, and URAP, a leading force in safeguarding Uyghur refugees and combating forced labour, represent the moral conscience of humanity. Their work threatens no nation, but rather calls for accountability, dignity, and respect for human rights.

China’s sanctioning of these organisations is also a veiled threat to democratic societies. The PRC’s actions seek to sow fear among activists and organisations worldwide while simultaneously pressuring cultural and academic institutions to adopt narratives like “Xizang” in place of “Tibet,” aiming to erase Tibetan identity altogether. Such tactics are part of a long-term strategy to undermine global solidarity with Tibetans, Uyghurs, and other persecuted minorities under CCP rule.

We call on the Canadian government, and democratic nations worldwide, to stand resolutely against these acts of transnational repression. Governments must protect human rights defenders within their jurisdictions and ensure they can continue their vital work without fear of retaliation.

Moreover, GATPM urges the global community to remain vigilant and resist the PRC’s efforts to coerce Western institutions into complicity with its agenda of cultural annihilation. The names Tibet and East Turkestan are not mere geographical designations but symbols of resilience, history, and identity.

This latest attempt to stifle truth and rewrite history only strengthens our resolve. GATPM stands in unwavering solidarity with our partners and allies – the Canada Tibet Committee, the Uyghur Rights Advocacy Project, and countless others – committed to justice and freedom.

To the CCP: Your sanctions do not intimidate us. They galvanise us. The voices of Tibetans, Uyghurs, and all persecuted communities will not be silenced. Truth, justice, and humanity will prevail.

London, 24 December 2024 / GATPM

Dear Friends and Supporters,

As we reflect on another impactful year, we at the Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities extend our warmest wishes to you and your families. Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year!

Your unwavering support has enabled us to achieve significant milestones in 2024, advancing our mission to advocate for justice and freedom for Tibetans and other persecuted communities worldwide. This year’s highlights include:

• Collaborating with the American Bar Association (ABA), which in August passed a historic resolution on Tibet, recognising the need to address human rights abuses and promote justice for the Tibetan people as per the UN resolutions. This milestone was achieved through our sustained advocacy and strategic efforts over the past two years.
• Exposing Chinese influence on cultural institutions, such as British Museum and museums in Paris, to challenge the inappropriate use of “Xizang” in place of “Tibet,” ensuring Tibet’s rightful identity remains intact.
• Opposing the construction of China’s “super-embassy” in London, a development that threatens local democracy and signals Beijing’s growing interference.
• Advocating for Tibetan refugees in Nepal, underscoring their urgent need for protection and international support.
• Engaging with policymakers in the UK to push for a comprehensive audit of China’s human rights abuses, while amplifying the voices of persecuted communities, including Tibetans, Uyghurs, Mongolians, and Hongkongers.
• Continuing our efforts to combat the Uyghur genocide, support Taiwan’s democracy, and uphold freedom and justice for all persecuted minorities.

These accomplishments are a testament to the collective strength of our supporters and partners. Your commitment has been pivotal in ensuring these critical issues remain on the global agenda.

As we look forward to 2025, your continued support will be vital to sustaining our efforts and achieving greater impact. Together, we can bring about meaningful change for those who are denied justice and freedom.

Thank you for standing with us in this journey. May this festive season fill your homes with peace, love, hope, and joy.

Warm regards,

Tsering Passang
Founder & Chair
Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities (GATPM)

London, UK | 18th December 2024 | GATPM

The British Museum is facing mounting pressure to amend its Silk Roads exhibition amidst accusations of misrepresenting Tibetan heritage and legitimising the Chinese government’s narrative on Tibet. Tibetan community leaders and human rights advocates are demanding the removal of the term “Xizang Autonomous Region” from all exhibition materials, asserting that it undermines Tibet’s historical and cultural identity.

The controversy stems from the Museum’s use of the phrase “Tibet or Xizang Autonomous Region” in labels and catalogue materials describing Tibetan artefacts. This terminology ignores the ongoing struggle for Tibetan autonomy and reinforces China’s political agenda.

“The British Museum’s adoption of ‘Xizang Autonomous Region’ is not only inaccurate but deeply offensive to Tibetans,” said Tsering Passang, Founder and Chairman of the Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities (GATPM). “It mirrors the Chinese Communist Party’s efforts to erase Tibet from the global map, rewrite its history, and suppress the Tibetan people’s peaceful culture.”

Museum Accused of Complicity in Cultural Erasure

The Silk Roads exhibition, which opened in September 2024, explores cultural exchanges across Asia and Europe between 500 and 1000 CE. However, the Museum’s labelling of Tibetan artefacts has sparked outrage within the Tibetan community. In a letter to the Museum’s Director, Dr. Nicholas Cullinan OBE, the Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities and the Tibetan Community in Britain argue that this terminology legitimises the Chinese government’s claim over Tibet and diminishes its historical sovereignty and cultural distinctiveness.

“This is not simply a matter of semantics,” said Phuntsok Norbu, Chairman of the Tibetan Community in Britain. “It’s about the Museum’s responsibility to present history accurately and ethically. By using ‘Xizang Autonomous Region,’ the Museum is complicit in the erasure of Tibetan identity.”

Demands for Immediate Action

After falling short of addressing the concerns and recommendations through discussion as requested in their first letter, the Tibetan groups are now demanding that the British Museum take immediate action to rectify the situation, including:

• Remove the contested labelling: Eliminate all references to “Xizang Autonomous Region” and use “Tibet” exclusively in all exhibition materials.
• Issue a formal apology: Publicly apologise to the Tibetan community for the misrepresentation of their heritage and the distress caused.
• Engage in meaningful dialogue: Consult with Tibetan scholars and community representatives to ensure the accurate and respectful representation of Tibetan culture and history in future exhibitions.

A Global Pattern of Misrepresentation

The controversy surrounding the Silk Roads exhibition highlights a broader pattern of misrepresentation of Tibetan heritage in international institutions. Similar concerns have been raised about museums in France that have used terms like “Xizang” or “Himalayan World” in their exhibits, further diluting Tibetan identity.

“The British Museum has a moral obligation to stand up for truth and justice,” said Passang. “It must not allow itself to be used as a tool for Chinese propaganda. We urge the Museum to take immediate action to correct this injustice and ensure that Tibetan history and culture are presented with the respect and dignity they deserve.”

Museum’s Response Deemed Inadequate

The British Museum responded to the initial complaint by defending its use of “Tibet or Xizang Autonomous Region,” claiming it reflects the contemporary region. However, Tibetan advocates have rejected this explanation, arguing that it ignores the political implications of adopting terminology aligned with the Chinese Communist Party.

“This is not just about labels; it’s about the Museum’s role in shaping global understanding of a culture that is actively being suppressed,” said Norbu.

Call for Ethical Leadership

The Tibetan groups are calling on the British Museum to demonstrate leadership in presenting history and heritage with honesty and respect. “The Museum’s reputation as a guardian of world heritage depends on its willingness to confront uncomfortable truths and uphold ethical standards,” Passang emphasised.

British Museum Letter – 18th December 2024

Dear Dr. Cullinan,

We acknowledge receipt of Ms. Jane Portal’s response, dated 13th December 2024 and received via email on the morning of 17th December, addressing our concerns about the misrepresentation of Tibetan heritage in the Silk Roads exhibition. While we appreciate her effort in responding, her reply falls short of adequately addressing the substantive issues outlined in our original letter to you and the British Museum Board.

Ms. Portal asserts that the terminology “Tibet or Xizang Autonomous Region” refers to the contemporary region. However, this explanation disregards the broader political context. The Chinese government’s use of “Xizang” is widely recognised as a deliberate effort to erase Tibet from the global map and diminish its historical and cultural identity. 

The United Kingdom Government has neither adopted nor endorsed this terminology, making its inclusion by the British Museum deeply troubling.

The Museum’s use of this nomenclature, particularly in the Silk Roads exhibition catalogue, inadvertently validates the Chinese government’s narrative. This undermines Tibet’s historical and cultural distinctiveness, which the British Museum, as a trusted guardian of world heritage, has a moral responsibility to protect.

While Ms. Portal highlights references to the “Tibetan Empire” and “Tibet” in the exhibition’s main narrative, these acknowledgments do not mitigate the harm caused by the problematic labels. Equating “Tibet” with “Xizang Autonomous Region” creates a false equivalence that obscures Tibet’s unique history and identity, further eroding trust with the Tibetan community.

The British Museum’s professed commitment to engaging with the Tibetan diaspora and scholars rings hollow when its actions contradict these assurances. Genuine engagement requires listening to and acting upon legitimate concerns, rather than deflecting them with vague statements of intent.

In light of the ongoing concerns, we reiterate and expand upon our original demands:

1. Immediate Removal: The term “Tibet or Xizang Autonomous Region” must be removed from all labels and exhibition materials. “Tibet” should be used exclusively to reflect the region and its historical context.
2. Formal Apology: The British Museum should issue a public apology to the Tibetan community for misrepresenting their heritage and for the distress caused.
3. Consultation and Collaboration: The Museum must initiate a meaningful consultation process with representatives of the Tibetan community and scholars to ensure accurate and respectful representation of Tibetan history and culture in future exhibitions.

The integrity of the British Museum, as a leading global institution, depends on its commitment to ethical representation. We urge you to take prompt and decisive action to address these concerns.

We look forward to receiving your response outlining the steps you will take to rectify this matter.

Sincerely,

Cc: Phuntsok Norbu, Chairman, Tibetan Community in Britain

British Museum Letter – 25th November 2024

25th November 2024

Subject: Urgent Concerns Regarding Misrepresentation of Tibetan Heritage in the Silk Roads Exhibition

Dear Dr. Nicholas Cullinan,

We write to you as the Chairs of the Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities (GATPM) and the Tibetan Community in Britain to raise critical concerns regarding the representation of Tibetan heritage in the Silk Roads exhibition at the British Museum.

While the exhibition offers a valuable contribution to understanding cultural interconnectedness across Asia, we are deeply troubled by the use of the term “Xizang Autonomous Region” in reference to Tibet within the artefact labelling and related materials. This nomenclature, rooted in the Chinese government’s political agenda, misrepresents the historical and cultural reality of Tibet as a distinct and independent nation with its unique identity, language, and spiritual traditions.

Tibet’s distinctiveness is not merely a relic of the past – it is an enduring identity under severe threat. Today, Tibetans face the systematic erasure of their culture and autonomy, including:

• Forcible assimilation of Tibetan children into boarding schools that separate them from their language and traditions.
• Destruction of sacred sites and restrictions on religious practices.
• Suppression of Tibetan language and literature, undermining their linguistic heritage.

As a globally respected cultural institution, the British Museum bears a profound responsibility to present history and heritage with integrity. By using the terminology – “Xizang Autonomous Region,” the Museum inadvertently legitimises the Chinese state narrative, which seeks to deny Tibet’s unique status and cultural richness.

This concern is not isolated to the British Museum. Other prominent institutions, such as the Musée du quai Branly and Musée Guimet in Paris, have similarly adopted terms like “Xizang” or “Himalayan World,” further diluting Tibetan identity and empowering Beijing’s political agenda.

The UK’s historical engagement with Tibet underscores the nation’s unique status. From early 20th-century trade missions to the Simla Convention of 1914 and the education of Tibetan students directly from Tibet in Britain, these interactions reflected recognition of Tibet’s sovereignty and cultural distinctiveness.

We strongly urge the British Museum to:

1. Reconsider the labelling of Tibetan artefacts in the exhibition and associated materials, ensuring the use of the term “Tibet” rather than politically motivated labels such as “Xizang Autonomous Region.”
2. Include historical and contextual information about Tibet’s current situation, highlighting ongoing human rights abuses and the suppression of Tibetan culture under Chinese rule.

Taking these steps would uphold the Museum’s commitment to impartiality and academic rigour while setting a global standard for the ethical representation of marginalised peoples and cultures. The Silk Roads exhibition is an opportunity to honour Tibet’s heritage and draw attention to the urgent need for its preservation. Persistent use of “Xizang Autonomous Region” instead of “Tibet” would distort historical accounts, endorse China’s colonial rule over Tibet, and marginalise Tibetan voices further.

We welcome the opportunity to discuss these concerns and recommendations with you at your earliest convenience.

Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

Sincerely,

Media Coverage – Update 5th January 2025

London | 10th December 2024 | GATPM

Honouring His Legacy on Human Rights Day with the Tibetan Peace Garden’s 25th Anniversary

As the world observes Human Rights Day, we celebrate the extraordinary life and legacy of His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso. For over six decades, the Dalai Lama has been a guiding light for peace, compassion, and justice. His leadership has defined the Tibetan freedom movement and transformed the Tibetan political system into a model of democratic governance.

This year also marks the 35th anniversary of His Holiness receiving the Nobel Peace Prize in 1989, recognising his steadfast commitment to non-violence and his “Middle Way” approach, which seeks genuine autonomy for Tibet within the framework of the People’s Republic of China. His unyielding belief in dialogue and mutual respect as paths to peace stands as a testament to his vision and resolve.

The Dalai Lama’s commitment to democracy is among his most profound contributions. Under his leadership, the Tibetan government-in-exile (now the Central Tibetan Administration) evolved into a democratic institution. In 2011, His Holiness made the historic decision to relinquish his political authority, transferring leadership to an elected Sikyong, or Tibetan Prime Minister. This bold move ensured that the Tibetan struggle for freedom would be sustained by democratic principles and the collective will of the Tibetan people.

As he approaches his 90th birthday in 2025, His Holiness continues to inspire millions worldwide through his teachings on compassion, interdependence, and justice. His dedication to interfaith dialogue, environmental stewardship, and the preservation of Tibetan culture has earned him numerous accolades, including the US Congressional Gold Medal and the Templeton Prize. Yet, his humility and four enduring commitments – to promote human values, foster interfaith harmony, preserve Tibetan culture, and revive ancient Nalanda wisdom – remain at the heart of his work.

A Milestone Celebration at the Tibetan Peace Garden

Today, the 25th anniversary of the Tibetan Peace Garden is also marked with an interfaith service led by faith leaders, the Mayor of Southwark and the London-based Dalai Lama’s Representative, organised by the Lelung Dharma Trust. This garden, blessed by His Holiness during its inauguration in 1999, embodies his vision of unity and peace.

At the heart of the Tibetan Peace Garden stands a stone pillar engraved with the Dalai Lama’s timeless message:

This profound message resonates deeply today, reminding us of the urgent need for collective action to foster peace and harmony.

A Call to Action

On behalf of the Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities (GATPM), Tsering Passang expressed gratitude for the Dalai Lama’s extraordinary contributions:

“His Holiness the Dalai Lama’s life and work inspire us to build a better future – one grounded in compassion, dialogue, and justice. As we celebrate this special anniversary of the Tibetan Peace Garden, let us recommit to his vision of a world where peace prevails and human dignity is upheld for all.”

As we prepare to celebrate the Dalai Lama’s 90th birthday in 2025, his teachings continue to guide humanity. Let us honour his legacy by choosing the path of peace and harmony for generations to come.

Useful Links:

http://www.dalailama.com

http://www.tibet.net

http://www.lelung.org