(Released by International Tibet Network)

To,
His Excellency Pablo Quirno Magrane, Minister of Foreign Affairs, International Trade and Worship of Argentina; Senator The Hon. Penny Wong, Australian Minister for Foreign Affairs; His Excellency Mauro Vieira, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Brazil; The Hon. Anita Anand, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Canada; His Excellency Jean-Noël Barrot, Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs of France; His Excellency Dr. Johann Wadephul, Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs of Germany; His Excellency Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, Minister of External Affairs of the Republic of India; His Excellency Antonio Tajani, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Italy; His Excellency Toshimitsu Motegi, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Japan; His Excellency Roberto Velasco Álvarez, Secretary of Foreign Affairs of Mexico; Her Excellency Maria Malmer Stenergard, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Sweden; The Rt Hon. Yvette Cooper MP, Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs of the United Kingdom; The Hon. Marco Rubio, Secretary of State of the United States of America; Her Excellency Kaja Kallas, Vice-President of the European Commission and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
Subject: As China’s New Assimilation Law Comes Into Force: 151 Tibet Groups Demand Your Action Against Beijing’s Forced Assimilation Campaign
Dear Honourable Foreign Ministers,
As China’s “Law on Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress” enters into force on 1 July 2026, we, on behalf of a coalition of 151 Tibet groups and supporters worldwide, condemn this law as a direct assault on the fundamental rights, identity, and future of the Tibetan people.
China’s new law marks a dangerous new escalation in Beijing’s campaign to erase the distinct identity of the Tibetan people. Behind the language of “unity” lies a powerful legal framework through which Tibetans can be punished for exercising fundamental rights: speaking their language, practising their religion, preserving their culture, and peacefully expressing their identity. It is the codification of policies that strike at the heart of Tibetan survival as a distinct people.
The law prioritises Mandarin Chinese in education and public life, mandates state-directed social integration, and expands penalties for alleged threats to “ethnic unity.” Article 20 of the law requires parents to educate children to “love the Communist Party of China” and prohibits the transmission of ideas deemed harmful to national unity. This grants Beijing unprecedented authority to regulate what Tibetan families teach their children about their history, culture, religion, and identity, while deepening systems of ideological control and social surveillance.
For years, China has implemented a vast colonial boarding school system that has removed at least one million Tibetan children from their families and communities. In these “schools,” Tibetan children are subjected to systematic cultural erasure. They are educated primarily in Chinese, denied meaningful access to their mother tongue, restricted from practising their religion, and subjected to intensive political indoctrination designed to reshape their identity and allegiance. Reports and broadcasts show Tibetan schoolchildren participating in military-style drills, patriotic ceremonies and “red education” programmes to cultivate loyalty to Xi Jinping, the Communist Party and the People’s Liberation Army. Disturbing images show children dressed in military fatigues, marching in formation and receiving instruction from military veterans in schools and kindergartens.
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk has sounded the alarm: “I am very concerned about China’s counterterrorism and assimilation policies, particularly as they affect minorities in the Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia and Tibetan regions. The new law on ethnic unity risks deepening restrictions on freedoms of language, education, practice of religion, culture, expression and assembly; and penalizing the peaceful exercise of minority rights in general. I call for the law to be repealed and for these practices to end.”
Governments must now join this call for repeal. As your country’s Foreign Minister, you carry a moral, legal, and political responsibility to oppose a law that will accelerate the erosion of Tibetan language, culture, religion, and identity. Silence in the face of this assault on a people’s language, culture, religion, and identity will be remembered as acquiescence.
Together, your governments are uniquely positioned to exercise strong and direct influence over China’s leadership. By acting in unison, you will not only strengthen your leverage with Beijing, but also ensure that participating governments are better protected against efforts to export authoritarian influence into our own democracies. We urge you to act now; collectively, decisively, and without delay.
Yours sincerely,

on behalf of the following organisations

And signatories of this petition https://actions.tibetnetwork.org/Reject-Unity-Law
FOOTNOTES
- GEOGRAPHICAL NOTE: ‘Tibet’ refers to the three Tibetan provinces of Amdo, Kham and U-Tsang. In the 1960s, the Chinese government split Tibet into new administrative divisions: the Tibetan Autonomous Region (TAR), and Tibetan Autonomous Prefectures within Qinghai, Gansu, Sichuan and Yunnan Provinces. When the Chinese government references Tibet, it is referring to the TAR.
- “China passes law on promoting ethnic unity,” The Guardian, 12 March 2026. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/12/china-ethnic-unity-law-parliament
- In Support of the Resolution of the Sino‐Tibet Conflict” Michael Van Walt, March 2026 “Tibetans are the majority in their own country and not someone else’s ethnic minority. The fact that Tibet is currently occupied by China does not change that. Beijing refers to Tibetans as one of its minorities or as an ethnic minority or ethnic group. This is a purposefully false representation. When Beijing calls Tibetans one of China’s ethnic minorities, it is not benignly communicating that the Tibetans are not numerically the majority in China. Beijing’s vocabulary is deliberately chosen to change our perception of the rights of the Tibetans, our perception of China’s entitlement to Tibet and the extent to which the situation inside Tibet is within or outside the purview of the international community’s scrutiny.” https://tibetnetwork.org/in-support-of-the-resolution-of-the-sino-tibet-conflict-handbook/
- Tibet Action: “When They Came to Take Our Children” – “When They Came to Take Our Children” – Tibet Action Institute
- International Campaign for Tibet, New PRC Ethnic Unity and Progress Law: Analysis and Implications, 2026. https://savetibet.org/new-prc-ethnic-unity-and-progress-law/
- Chinese state media reports on patriotic education and military-style activities in Tibetan schools, 2025–2026
- International Campaign for Tibet: The indoctrination of Tibetan elementary students: how the Communist Party enforces “Red” re-education with Mao worship and military training – – https://savetibet.org/the-indoctrination-of-tibetan-elementary-students-how-the-communist-party-enforces-red-re-education-with-mao-worship-and-military-training/
- 西藏那曲:驻校教官“云端”守护-新华网 http://www.xz.xinhua.org/20250123/ea758264067540ad8b4f0aaf0bc843ae/c.html
- Tibet Watch: China Deploys Military Veterans in Kindergartens and Schools in Tibet https://tibetwatch.org/china-deploys-military-veterans-in-kindergartens-and-schools-in-tibet/
- RFA: China deploys army veterans for military, political training in Tibetan schools https://www.rfa.org/english/tibet/2025/04/01/tibet-military-on-campus-instructors/
- “To cultivate patriotism, love for the border, and commitment to safeguarding and developing the border among young people and to strengthen their national defense awareness, on 17 October, the People’s Armed Forces Department of Gedang Township, Medog County, in conjunction with the Township’s New Era Civilization Practice Center and Veterans Affairs Station, carried out a “National Defense Education Enters the Campus” activity at Gedang Township Primary School. Using a three-dimensional model of “national defense theory + military skills + tactical training + firearms awareness,” the activity allowed young people to understand the weight of “the motherland is at ease with us guarding the border” through an immersive experience. The photo shows a retired soldier explaining a simulated weapon model to elementary school students.” https://archive.ph/WhvJ0
- UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk in his Global Update to the 62nd session of the Human Rights Council in June 2026, https://www.ohchr.org/en/statements-and-speeches/2026/06/turk-says-ultimate-trajectory-human-rights-larger-freedom
Report of the UN Special Rapporteur on Minority Issues to the 61st session of the United Nations Human Rights Council, 2026. https://docs.un.org/en/A/HRC/61/41 - UN Human Rights Experts raises concerns about China’s new ‘Law on Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress’ https://spcommreports.ohchr.org/TMResultsBase/DownLoadPublicCommunicationFile?gId=30922
- European Parliament resolution of 30 April 2026 on the new Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-10-2026-0152_EN.pdf
- International Tibet Network: UN human rights bodies have raised the alarm at the escalation of human rights violations in Tibet –https://tibetnetwork.org/un-alarm-human-rights-violations-in-tibet/
- International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
China ratified the ICESCR in 2001.
Article 1: Recognises the right of all peoples to self‑determination and to freely pursue their cultural development.
Article 2(2): States must guarantee that rights “will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
Article 15(1)(a): Everyone has the right to take part in cultural life, which has been interpreted to include the right of minorities to conserve, promote and develop their own cultures and languages, and not be forced into cultural assimilation.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-economic-social-and-cultural-rights
Convention on the Rights of the Child
China ratified the CRC in 1992, which protects children’s rights to develop in their own cultural identity and language.
Article 29(1)(c): Education must develop respect for the child’s own cultural identity, language, and values, including where they live or from where they originate.
The CRC also obliges states to ensure non‑discrimination and act in the best interests of the child in all decisions affecting them.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
China signed the ICCPR in 1998 but has not ratified it.
- article 27 – Explicitly protects the rights of ethnic, religious, or linguistic minorities to enjoy their own culture, profess and practice their religion, and use their own language.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD):
China has ratified this treaty in 1981, which obliges States to eliminate discrimination based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin, relevant to policies that disproportionately affect Tibetans.
- 5(e)(v) – right to education
- 5(d)(vii) – freedom of religion
- 5(e)(vi) – participation in cultural activities
- https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-convention-elimination-all-forms-racial


































































































































You must be logged in to post a comment.