Dear Friends and Supporters of Freedom, Human Rights, and Justice,
We need your urgent support to oppose a troubling development regarding the planning application for Royal Mint Court in London. The Chinese regime proposes to establish its largest embassy hub in Europe on this site – a “super-embassy” for Communist China.
This application, which was rejected by Tower Hamlets Council, representing the voice of the local community, has now been “called in” by the Planning Ministers for review. This reversal of local democracy follows direct intervention from China’s President Xi Jinping, who reportedly raised the issue with UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer during a phone call in August 2024.
A Threat to Local Democracy and Fundamental Freedoms
China’s authoritarian attempt to pressure the UK’s highest elected leaders undermines the democratic decisions of locally elected representatives. This sets a dangerous precedent: importing China’s disregard for fundamental rights and governance into our democratic system.
In China, any order from the central government is executed without question. Now, this same authoritarian model threatens to erode local democracy here in the United Kingdom. Allowing this would send a chilling message – that even here, the will of the people can be silenced by foreign pressure.
We cannot allow this overreach to take root. The public inquiry scheduled to begin on 11th February 2025 offers us a crucial opportunity to demonstrate the strength of our opposition.
What You Need to Know
What is a “called-in” application?
A “called-in” planning application bypasses decisions made by the local council and transfers the matter to national authorities for review. In this case, the Planning Inspector and the Secretary of State for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG), The Rt. Hon. Angela Rayner, who also serves as the Deputy Prime Minister, will evaluate the application. They will consider public objections, input from stakeholders, and the broader implications of the proposal before making a final decision.
Why is this important?
The initial rejection by Tower Hamlets Council reflected overwhelming local opposition and serious concerns. This review reopens the case, and without sustained pressure, there is a real risk the Council’s decision could be overturned.
What You Can Do to Help
1. Submit Objections
Write to the Planning Inspectorate to voice your opposition. Your comments will be reviewed by the Planning Inspector and the Secretary of State. Key points to include:
The impact on the local community and residents.
Environmental concerns related to the proposal.
Breaches of planning guidelines and principles.
The dangerous precedent of foreign authoritarian interference.
2. Spread the Word
Encourage friends, family, and local organisations to submit objections. A collective voice demonstrates the strength of public resistance.
3. Contact Your MP
Urge your local MP to oppose this application and speak out in defense of democracy, local governance, and community rights.
4. Attend the Public Inquiry
The inquiry opens on 11th February 2025. A strong presence from the community will send a clear message to decision-makers: We stand united against this proposal.
Include the application reference number i.e. APP/E5900/V/24/3353754, your full name, and your contact information.
Deadlines for submissions 2nd December 2024.
Why This Matters
This is not just about a planning application. It is a battle to uphold our democratic values and ensure that local decisions cannot be overturned by foreign authoritarian influence. By taking action now, we can protect our community and send a powerful message: Democracy and local governance must not be undermined.
Thank you for your support and commitment to justice and freedom. Together, we can make a difference.
Warm regards,
Tsering Passang
Founder & Chair
Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities (GATPM)
The Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities (GATPM) is calling on the UK government to block controversial plans for a massive Chinese “super-embassy” near the Tower of London. Citing serious concerns over human rights, public safety, and community welfare, GATPM joins growing opposition to the project, centred on the Royal Mint Court site, which the Chinese government purchased in 2018 for £255 million.
A latest protest against the “super-embassy” is planned for Saturday, 30th November, at 2pm, at the site, led by local residents, human rights defenders, and community leaders. Join the protest outside The Royal Mint Court Site on Saturday, 30th November @2pm.
The Chinese government bought Royal Mint Court in 2018 for £255 million but has not yet secured planning permission. Photo: Alamy
Public Backlash and Safety Concerns
The proposed embassy, set to be the largest Chinese diplomatic mission in Europe, has drawn widespread criticism from local residents, Tower Hamlets Council, and counterterrorism officials. The Metropolitan Police’s counterterrorism unit has raised alarm over the location, warning it could become a flashpoint for large-scale demonstrations against China’s human rights abuses.
Jon Savell, a senior counterterrorism official with the Metropolitan Police, highlighted concerns about the inadequate space at the site to accommodate protests.
Demonstrations could disrupt nearby tourist hotspots, including the Tower of London, and obstruct vital routes, such as emergency access to the Royal London Hospital. Savell cautioned that such disruptions could have dire, life-threatening consequences and that managing protests would further burden overstretched police resources.
Human Rights at the Forefront
The planned embassy has become a symbol of Beijing’s oppressive policies, which include the ongoing genocide of Uyghurs, suppression of Tibetan culture, and erosion of freedoms in Hong Kong. Critics argue that allowing this “super-embassy” would embolden China’s authoritarian regime at home and abroad whilst further undermining human rights and free speech.
A troubling precedent occurred in 2022, when a pro-democracy protester was assaulted on the grounds of the Chinese consulate in Manchester. This incident underlines the potential risks posed by embassies tied to regimes that disregard international norms.
“The proposed site is not just a planning issue; it symbolises China’s blatant disregard for human rights and democratic values,” said Tsering Passang, Founder and Chair of GATPM. “Approving this embassy would send the wrong message and undermine the UK’s commitment to freedom and justice.”
Local Leadership Stands Firm
Tower Hamlets Council, backed by London Mayor Sadiq Khan, has already rejected the embassy’s planning application, reflecting the concerns of local residents and elected leaders. Despite this, China has resubmitted its plans with only minor modifications, ignoring local objections and undermining democratic governance.
The original application received over 50 objections, citing potential surveillance risks, threats to public safety, and the adverse impact on the neighbourhood’s character. The Chinese government’s push to override local decisions has fuelled further outrage.
GATPM’s Call to Action
The GATPM urges Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and the UK government to uphold the Council’s decision and prevent the embassy’s construction. This is not merely a planning issue but a principled stand in defence of human rights, public safety, and democratic values.
“This is about more than a building – it’s about safeguarding the rights and safety of British communities while sending a clear message that the UK will not tolerate Beijing’s human rights violations,” said Passang.
The Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities calls for vigilance and solidarity to ensure human rights and democratic principles remain central to this critical decision.
———————————————————-
From Lord David Alton’s Website:
Minister says proposal for a CCP mega embassy on the Royal Mint Site “has now been called in for decision by Planning Ministers. A public local inquiry will be held at which residents and other interested parties will be able to make representations”
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, has provided the following answer to your written parliamentary question (HL2372):
Question by Lord Alton of Liverpool: To ask His Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking to ensure that the residents of Tower Hamlets who may be affected by the planned new Chinese Embassy have sufficient opportunity to voice their concerns to the Government about the proposed development. (HL2372)
Tabled on: 11 November 2024
Answer: Baroness Taylor of Stevenage:
This proposal has now been called in for decision by Planning Ministers. A public local inquiry will be held at which residents and other interested parties will be able to make representations, and these will be taken into account when a final decision is made.
Angela Rayner MP, Deputy Prime Minister; Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government
Jim McMahon MP, Minister of State for Local Government and English Devolution
Matthew Pennycook MP, Minister of State for Housing and Planning
Note: Prepare your letter in advance in PDF or suitable format, which you can attach in the above form. If you require any help, please contact GATPM@AllianceTibet.
The Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities (GATPM) is making headlines once again. Radio Free Asia (RFA) Tibetan, the premier Tibetan broadcasting station based in Washington, D.C., has reached out to GATPM for an exclusive feature.
As part of its segment on non-governmental organisations, reporter Rigzin Chodon interviews Tsering Passang, Founder and Chair of GATPM, based in London, UK. The conversation explores the organisation’s mission, its advocacy campaigns, and the strategies it employs to champion the rights of the Tibetans and persecuted minorities.
The two-part interview aired on November 15 and 22. Click the links below to listen to the broadcasts directly on Radio Free Asia (RFA) Tibetan.
Reporter: Rigzin Chodon
Editor: Dhondup Namgyal
Web Publisher: Nordon
༧༧།། གཞུང་འབྲེལ་མ་ཡིན་པའི་ཚོགས་པ་ཞེས་པའི་ལེ་ཚན་ནང་། དབྱིན་ཡུལ་གྱི་རྒྱལ་ས་ལོན་དྲོན་ནང་རྟེན་གཞི་བྱེད་པའི་གོ་ལའི་ནང་མནར་གཅོད་འོག་མྱོང་བཞིན་པའི་བོད་དང་གྲངས་ཉུང་མི་རིགས་སམ་ Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities ཞེས་པའི་ཚོགས་པའི་དམིགས་ཡུལ་དང་ཞུ་གཏུགས་ཀྱི་ལས་འགུལ་སྤེལ་བའི་བརྒྱུད་རིམ་སྐོར་ཚེ་རིང་པ་སངས་ལགས་སུ་རིག་འཛིན་ཆོས་སྒྲོན་ལགས་ཀྱི་བཀའ་འདྲི་ཞུས་པ་ཞིག་གཤམ་ལ་གསན་གནང་གི་རེད།
Protest: Trade Unionists Say ‘Free the Hong Kong 45!’
3pm Saturday 30 November 2024
Embassy of China, 49 Portland Place, London W1B 1JL
On 19 November, 45 defendants in the trial of the Hong Kong 47 democratic activists were sentenced to years in prison. Among them: 6 years 9 months for socialist former opposition lawmaker Leung Kwok-hung, and nurse and former trade union leader Winnie Yu; and 4 years 5 months for aviation worker and trade union leader Carol Ng. They were convicted under Beijing’s tyrannical “National Security Law” simply for organising to demand democracy.
Democracy and freedom to organise are as vital as oxygen for our movement. On 30 November, join our trade unionists’ demonstration to support our sentenced comrades and all those fighting for democratic and workers’ movements in Hong Kong:
Free Carol Ng, Winnie Yu, Leung Kwok-hung and all the HK47 – quash their convictions!
Free Lee Cheuk-yan, Chow Hang-tung and all Hongkongers repressed for pro-worker and pro-democracy activity!
Free political prisoners in mainland China including feminist Sophia Huang Xueqin, workers’ rights activist Wang Jianbing, civil rights activist Xu Zhiyong, and Uyghur intellectuals Rahile Dawut, Ilham Tohti and Perhat Tursun!
Freedom to organise independent trade unions and political opposition in Hong Kong & China!
Supported by:
香港勞權監察 Hong Kong Labour Rights Monitor
Workers Against the CCP
John McDonnell MP
Nadia Whittome MP
John Moloney, PCS Assistant General Secretary
Emma Runswick, BMA Deputy Chair (pc)
Ben Selby, FBU Assistant General Secretary
Rhian Keyse, UCU National Executive
Vicky Blake, UCU National Executive
Elaine Jones, UNISON National Executive
Ed Whitby, UNISON National Executive
Matthew Hull, Green Party NEC Trade Union Liaison Office
Today, we celebrate the long-overdue release of Karma Samdrup, a highly respected Tibetan environmentalist, philanthropist, and advocate for Tibet’s cultural and natural heritage, who endured a 15-year unjust prison sentence under the Chinese authorities.
Karma Samdrup’s unwavering dedication to environmental preservation, particularly wildlife conservation, and his steadfast efforts to safeguard Tibetan language and culture are acts of extraordinary courage. His work stands as an enduring symbol of resilience in the face of systemic repression.
I vividly recall meeting Karma Samdrup about 20 years ago in central London, near a Tesco store, during his visit with another Tibetan companion. Dressed proudly in his traditional Tibetan attire, he exuded dignity, humility, and purpose. After exchanging the greeting “Tashi Delek,” we engaged in a brief yet meaningful conversation. I shared insights about my work with the Tibet Foundation, which provided crucial support to Tibetan communities in education, healthcare, and community development inside Tibet. In response, Karma Samdrup graciously handed me his business card, its details carefully printed on both sides, and invited me to stay in touch – an act that reflected his deep commitment to fostering connections and advancing the shared development work.
Karma Samdrup
Karma Samdrup’s imprisonment is a sobering reminder of the harsh realities faced by Tibetans striving to protect their homeland, culture, and identity. His release is not only a moment of profound relief but also a rallying call for renewed global commitment to the rights of Tibetans and all persecuted communities.
At the Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities, we remain steadfast in our mission to seek justice for those oppressed under authoritarian regimes. While we welcome Karma Samdrup’s return to freedom – a freedom that remains relative – we pledge to continue amplifying the voices of those who remain silenced.
Karma Samdrup’s remarkable legacy as a guardian of Tibet’s natural and cultural treasures is an enduring inspiration to us all. Let his release serve as a reminder to the global community of its moral duty to stand in solidarity with the Tibetan people in their peaceful pursuit of justice, dignity, and fundamental freedoms.
We extend our heartfelt wishes to Karma Samdrup for a joyful reunion with his family and loved ones. May he find strength and healing as he begins this new chapter of his life.
Defending Freedom: Condemning Beijing’s Repression in Hong Kong and Calling for Global Action – A Statement by Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities
The Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities (GATPM) unequivocally condemns the sentencing of pro-democracy leaders, activists, legislators, social workers, journalists, and academics in Hong Kong under the draconian National Security Law imposed by Beijing’s authoritarian regime. These individuals have been punished not for any crime, but for standing up for their fundamental rights and freedoms – values enshrined in the Sino-British Joint Declaration and international law.
Since the imposition of the National Security Law in 2020, the Chinese Communist Party has weaponised it to dismantle Hong Kong’s democratic institutions, silence dissent, and intimidate civil society. This law is not a tool for security but a weapon of repression, targeting anyone who dares to challenge Beijing’s tightening grip over the once-autonomous territory.
The sentencing of these courageous individuals is emblematic of a broader pattern of human rights abuses orchestrated by the Chinese government, both within and beyond its borders. From the genocide of Uyghurs in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (East Turkistan) to the repression of Tibetans in occupied-Tibet, Mongolians, and Falun Gong practitioners, and the bullying of Taiwan, China has consistently demonstrated a blatant disregard for human dignity, rule of law, and international norms.
Hong Kong is a stark warning to the world. The erosion of freedoms under the pretext of “national security” could become a template exported to other nations, undermining global human rights and democratic values. This cannot be tolerated.
We call on the UK Government to honour its historical and legal obligations under the Sino-British Joint Declaration by:
Imposing targeted sanctions against Hong Kong and Chinese officials responsible for human rights abuses.
Expanding safe haven policies to ensure that Hongkongers fleeing persecution have access to asylum and refuge in the UK and other democracies.
Demanding international accountability through the United Nations and other platforms for the deterioration of freedoms in Hong Kong.
Strengthening alliances with like-minded nations to counter Beijing’s authoritarian expansionism.
We urge the international community to adopt a united and robust approach to hold Beijing accountable for its violations and to protect the rights of Hong Kong’s people. The values of freedom, democracy, and justice demand nothing less.
The struggle of Hongkongers is not just their own – it is a fight for the universal principles of liberty and human dignity. The world must stand with them.
Tsering Passang,
Founder & Chair, Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities (GATPM) 20 November 2024
On Saturday, 16th November 2024, the UK Uyghur Community commemorated the declaration of East Turkistan’s independence in 1933 and 1944 with a meaningful event held at Uyghur School in North London. This annual gathering united community members and supporters to reflect on their rich history, celebrate cultural heritage, and inspire the younger generation with a message of resilience and hope.
The event commenced at 1:30 PM, offering a thoughtfully curated programme of educational and cultural activities, ensuring attendees – especially children – gained a deeper appreciation of their heritage.
Purpose and Significance of the Event
The celebration emphasised the importance of remembering the Republic of East Turkistan’s brief yet significant independence, symbolising a beacon of hope for Uyghurs striving for freedom under China’s ongoing occupation. This year’s theme focused on educating children about the sacrifices and achievements of their ancestors, fostering pride and a sense of responsibility to preserve their identity.
Dilnaz Kerim, Youth Leader
Dilnaz Kerim, a member of the UK Uyghur Community’s Youth Committee, eloquently expressed the essence of the occasion:
“We celebrate this day to remember our ancestors and their contributions that have shaped our identity. This is also a day of hope for us, as we remind ourselves of the great things our ancestors did and encourage ourselves to stay strong and continue our fight for our people’s freedom.”
Event Highlights
The program was meticulously designed to engage and inspire children, showcasing the legacy of Uyghur resilience and cultural pride. Key highlights included:
National Anthem: A unifying opening that honoured the spirit of East Turkistan.
Poetry Recitations: Heartfelt performances by children, including “The Struggle Will Not Die,”“Greetings to My Homeland,” and “My Mother School,” celebrating the enduring fight for freedom and cultural roots.
Cultural Dances: Traditional performances like the Kök Böre (Blue Wolf) dance by boys and the Meshrep dance by girls, highlighting Uyghur vibrancy.
Violin Performance: A poignant rendition of Bella Ciao by a young girl, symbolising the universal spirit of resistance.
History Session: An engaging storytelling segment that recounted the historical milestones of the Republic of East Turkistan.
A Day Dedicated to the Future
This year’s event was especially dedicated to children, reinforcing the importance of understanding Uyghur history and taking pride in their cultural identity. Recognising the vital role of youth in sustaining their heritage, the event aimed to equip them with the knowledge and inspiration needed to carry forward their ancestors’ legacy.
Dilnaz Kerim aptly summarised the day’s significance:
“This day is for the kids, to remind them how great our ancestors were. We learn from their courage and keep thriving so that the history of the Uyghurs does not fade away.”
The gathering was further enriched by the presence of Friends of Uyghurs, reflecting a shared solidarity and hope for a future where Uyghurs can reclaim their freedom and dignity.
Conclusion
The Remembering the Republic of East Turkistan event was a profound occasion of reflection and hope, underscoring the importance of cultural preservation, education, and unity. By engaging the younger generation, the UK Uyghur Community is ensuring that their rich heritage and aspirations are not only remembered but also serve as a source of inspiration for the future.
7th November 2024 | Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities (GATPM)
The Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities (GATPM) congratulates President Donald J. Trump on his re-election as the 47th President of the United States. We urge the new administration to reaffirm America’s commitment to global human rights, justice, and accountability, values that face unprecedented threats today. Now, more than ever, strong U.S. leadership is crucial in defending these principles worldwide.
Official portrait of President Donald J. Trump, Friday, October 6, 2017. (Official White House photo by Shealah Craighead)
During President Trump’s first term, the United States made significant progress in supporting the Tibetan people’s fight for fundamental rights and autonomy. The administration’s enactment of the Reciprocal Access to Tibet Act of 2018 and the Tibetan Policy and Support Act of 2020 marked critical steps in holding China accountable for human rights abuses and supporting Tibetans’ aspirations to preserve their culture, language, and spiritual heritage. The Reciprocal Access to Tibet Act pioneered efforts to counter China’s systematic restriction of foreign access to Tibet, thereby enhancing independent observation and reporting on human rights conditions in the region. Meanwhile, the Tibetan Policy and Support Act bolstered U.S. commitments to protect Tibetans’ religious freedom and promote a future of genuine autonomy.
As President Trump prepares for his second term, GATPM calls for immediate, decisive actions to expand upon these commitments. One urgent priority is the swift appointment of a U.S. Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues, as mandated by Congress, to lead a coordinated response to ongoing rights abuses in Tibet and champion Tibetan rights on the international stage. Additionally, we urge the administration to advocate for Tibet in multilateral forums, encouraging global allies to join in pressing China to end its repressive policies.
Beyond Tibet, GATPM calls on the United States to adopt a principled stance against the full range of China’s rights violations, including its draconian policies in Xinjiang (East Turkistan), Southern Mongolia, and Hong Kong, along with its growing aggression toward Taiwan. As Beijing expands its territorial ambitions and tightens its authoritarian control, the international community must stand united in demanding accountability. The United States should lead in implementing policies that uphold the rule of law, protect persecuted minorities, and collaborate with allies to counter these mounting threats.
With its enduring commitment to justice and the rule of law, the United States holds a unique position in the global defence of human rights. We hope that, under President Trump’s leadership, the U.S. will continue to prioritise the freedom and security of oppressed communities, champion human rights, and support multilateral efforts that advance peace and justice.
We also extend our gratitude to President Joe Biden, his administration, and the U.S. Congress for their continued support for Tibet, including the Resolve Tibet Act (2024), and persecuted minorities facing repression in China.
Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities Welcomes UN Statement on Human Rights Abuses in China
The Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities (GATPM) applauds the joint statement delivered at the UN General Assembly by a coalition of nations, led by Australia, condemning human rights violations in Tibet and Xinjiang (East Turkestan), both currently occupied by the People’s Republic of China.
The statement, delivered on October 22nd by Ambassador James Larsen of Australia, highlights the critical need for international action to address the ongoing abuses faced by Uyghurs and other minorities in Xinjiang, as well as Tibetans in their homeland. The alliance of progressive nations including Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Japan, Lithuania, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States, demonstrates a courageous and principled commitment to universal human rights.
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights’ assessment detailed widespread human rights violations, including forced labour, mass detentions, torture, and the erosion of cultural and religious freedoms. These findings, coupled with credible reports from Tibet, demand urgent attention from the global community.
GATPM urges all UN member states to join this growing coalition. We call for independent investigations, the release of all arbitrarily detained individuals, and unwavering support for the fundamental human rights of the people in Tibet and Xinjiang.
This situation transcends regional boundaries and represents a critical test of our collective commitment to human dignity, freedom, and justice.
“We are encouraged by the actions of these countries, but the fight is far from over,” said Tsering Passang, Founder and Chair of GATPM. “The time for united action is now. Together, we can make a lasting difference for those suffering under oppression.”
Contact:
Tsering Passang, Founder and Chair Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities Email: info@gatpm.com
UNGA79 THIRD COMMITTEE: GENERAL DISCUSSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS: JOINT STATEMENT ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION IN XINJIANG AND TIBET
Statement delivered by H.E. Mr James Larsen, Ambassador and Permanent Representative of Australia to the United Nations
22 October 2024
I have the honour of delivering this joint statement on behalf of the following countries Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Japan, Lithuania, Kingdom of the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States of America, and my own country, Australia.
These countries are all committed to universal human rights and have ongoing concerns about serious human rights violations in China.
Two years ago, the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights’ assessment on Xinjiang concluded that serious human rights violations had been committed in Xinjiang, and that the scale of the arbitrary and discriminatory detention of Uyghurs and other predominately Muslim minorities in Xinjiang “may constitute international crimes, in particular crimes against humanity”.
Subsequently, United Nations’ Treaty Bodies have taken similar views and made similar recommendations, including: The CERD in November 2022 through its concluding observations and Urgent Action Decision on Xinjiang; and The CRPD, CESCR and CEDAW in their September 2022, March 2023 and May 2023 Concluding Observations.
The Working Group on Arbitrary Detention has issued communications concerning multiple cases of arbitrary detention and enforced disappearances, and over 20 Special Procedure Mandate Holders have expressed concern about systemic human rights violations in Xinjiang.
Relying extensively on China’s own records, these comprehensive findings and recommendations by independent human rights experts from all geographic regions detail evidence of large-scale arbitrary detention, family separation, enforced disappearances and forced labour, systematic surveillance on the basis of religion and ethnicity; severe and undue restrictions on cultural, religious, and linguistic identity and expression; torture and sexual and gender-based violence, including forced abortion and sterilisation; and the destruction of religious and cultural sites.
China has had many opportunities meaningfully to address the UN’s well-founded concerns.
Instead, China labelled the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights’ assessment as ‘illegal and void during its Universal Periodic Review adoption in July.
According to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights’ statement in August, the problematic laws and policies in Xinjiang continue to remain in place.
The statement again called on China to undertake a full review, from the human rights perspective, of the legal framework governing national security and counterterrorism.
Mr Chair, as with our concerns for the situation in Xinjiang, we are also seriously concerned about credible reports detailing human rights abuses in Tibet.
United Nations human rights treaty bodies and United Nations Special Procedures have detailed the detention of Tibetans for the peaceful expression of political views; restrictions on travel; coercive labour arrangements; separation of children from families in boarding schools; and erosion of linguistic, cultural, educational and religious rights and freedoms in Tibet.
We urge China to uphold the international human rights obligations that it has voluntarily assumed, and to fully implement all UN recommendations including from the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights’ assessment, Treaty Bodies and other United Nations human rights mechanisms.
This includes releasing all individuals arbitrarily detained in both Xinjiang and Tibet, and urgently clarifying the fate and whereabouts of missing family members.
Transparency and openness are key to allaying concerns, and we call on China to allow unfettered and meaningful access to Xinjiang and Tibet for independent observers, including from the UN, to evaluate the human rights situation.
No country has a perfect human rights record, but no country is above fair scrutiny of its human rights obligations.
It is incumbent on all of us not to undermine international human rights commitments that benefit us all, and for which all states are accountable.
Rabi Lamichhane, a prominent Nepalese politician, journalist, and former television personality, has become the centre of political discussions across Nepal and abroad. Supporters of Lamichhane, who briefly held positions as Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister, have taken to the streets in protest, claiming that his removal from office may have been politically motivated.
Rabi Lamichhane Photo: Kathmandu Post
Background and Rise in Politics
Lamichhane, originally a media figure, gained nationwide fame for his investigative journalism and his championing of issues affecting marginalised communities. His direct, often confrontational approach to exposing corruption and social injustices earned him widespread public support, particularly among Nepal’s youth and disenfranchised communities. His television show, Sidha Kura Janata Sanga (Straight Talk with the People), became a platform for public accountability, turning Lamichhane into a household name.
In December 2022, Lamichhane transitioned from journalism to politics, leading his newly formed Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP). He won a seat in the House of Representatives from Chitwan-2, and shortly afterward, he was appointed as Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister in Pushpa Kamal Dahal‘s government. However, his political career faced a major setback in January 2023, when the Supreme Court disqualified him, citing that he was still a U.S. citizen at the time of his candidacy. The ruling forced him to relinquish his positions and temporarily derailed his political momentum.
Allegations of Political Vendetta
Supporters of the RSP shout slogans in support of Rabi Lamichhane outside the Supreme Court on Friday, 18th October 2024 evening. Photo: RSS (Source: Nepali Times)
Lamichhane’s supporters believe his removal from office was not solely a legal matter but part of a larger political conspiracy orchestrated by Nepal’s established political elite. Many point fingers at the incumbent Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli and his government, suggesting that Lamichhane’s rapid rise and increasing popularity posed a threat to the traditional political order. Oli’s government had been accused of using legal technicalities to neutralise political rivals in the past, and Lamichhane’s case, they argue, was no different.
Some analysts contend that the scrutiny around Lamichhane’s citizenship was exaggerated and politically motivated. His growing influence within a short span of time – along with his reformist agenda – allegedly rattled several established parties, including Oli’s Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist Leninist), who viewed him as a potential disruptor in Nepalese politics.
Political Future
Despite the setback, Lamichhane has remained a force in Nepalese politics. After regaining his citizenship, Lamichhane contested the by-elections in April 2023 and once again secured victory from Chitwan-2. His RSP continues to enjoy significant support, especially among voters disillusioned by Nepal’s traditional political parties.
Lamichhane’s future remains promising, though uncertain. While he has successfully reclaimed his political position, his ability to navigate Nepal’s often turbulent political landscape is still being tested. Whether he can continue his reformist agenda or face further legal and political challenges remains to be seen. However, the widespread protests in his favour suggest that he still enjoys strong grassroots support, positioning him as a key figure in shaping Nepal’s political future.
Lamichhane’s critics argue that he lacks the political experience needed to implement sustainable changes, while his supporters view him as a necessary alternative to Nepal’s entrenched political establishment. The coming months will likely determine whether he can convert his popularity into lasting political power, or whether the forces aligned against him will continue to impede his rise.
UPDATE: 22nd October 2024
Could Nepal Become the Next Bangladesh Amid Growing Protests Against the Government?
Nepal is witnessing a wave of public protests, most notably in support of Rabi Lamichhane, leader of the Rashtriya Swatantra Party (RSP), which signal growing dissatisfaction with the government. Accusations against Lamichhane and his party, widely seen as politically motivated, have ignited broader frustrations over corruption and poor governance. Lamichhane’s supporters have taken to the streets, accusing the government of a political vendetta, demanding justice, and challenging the status quo. The movement, while focused on Lamichhane, echoes deeper concerns about the country’s leadership.
Protest by supporters of Rabi Lamichhane in Pokhara Valley, western Nepal on on 21st October 2024 (Video screenshot: News in Nepal)
Though these protests could escalate into a larger national movement, it is uncertain whether they will spark immediate political change. Nepal’s political history is turbulent, having cycled through 13 different governments in the past 16 years. The nation’s strategic position, wedged between India and China, only adds to its complexity. Both regional powers vie for influence, and Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli’s government has often been perceived as leaning toward Beijing. This alignment could have far-reaching consequences for Nepal’s future, especially as tensions simmer domestically.
As for Oli, despite facing mounting political pressure and allegations from Lamichhane’s camp, there is no substantial evidence to suggest that he might flee to either India or China. Speculation about his potential asylum remains largely rumour, with little indication that the ongoing protests will force him from power. Oli continues to assert his leadership, staying actively engaged in domestic governance.
The trajectory of these protests remains to be seen, but the parallels with Bangladesh’s political unrest raise questions about Nepal’s own future as public discontent grows louder.
The Rt. Hon David Lammy MP, UK Foreign Secretary Photo: FCDO
David Lammy MP, the UK’s Foreign Secretary, is poised to make his inaugural official visit to Beijing and Shanghai this week, marking the highest-level engagement with Communist China by Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour government to date.
As a Tibetan living in the UK, I watch with a mixture of hope and trepidation as the Foreign Secretary prepares to embark on a diplomatic mission to China. While I understand the importance of maintaining diplomatic relations, I cannot ignore the urgent humanitarian crisis unfolding in my homeland.
Tibet, once an independent nation, has been under Chinese occupation for decades. Our culture, language, and religion have been systematically eroded, and countless Tibetans have been subjected to human rights abuses. The Chinese government’s relentless suppression of Tibetan identity and its disregard for our fundamental freedoms have driven many to despair.
One of the most pressing issues facing Tibet is the succession of the Dalai Lama, our spiritual leader. The Chinese government has long sought to undermine the Dalai Lama’s authority and impose its own puppet in his place. The Panchen Lama, the second-highest religious figure in Tibetan Buddhism, was kidnapped as a child by the Chinese authorities and has not been seen or heard from since. His disappearance is a stark reminder of the Chinese government’s ruthless tactics to control Tibet.
I implore the Foreign Secretary to use this opportunity to raise the plight of the Tibetan people with the Chinese government. It is crucial that he advocates for the release of political prisoners, the restoration of Tibetan cultural and religious freedoms, and the recognition of the Dalai Lama’s rightful successor.
By speaking out on behalf of Tibet, the Foreign Secretary can send a powerful message to the Chinese government that its actions are being closely watched by the international community. It is only through sustained pressure and engagement that we can hope to achieve meaningful change in Tibet.
As Tibetans continue to face persecution, their voices are often drowned out by larger geopolitical concerns. It is imperative that the UK uses its influence to advocate for the Tibetan people’s basic human rights. Tibetans living under oppression look to the international community for support, and this visit is an opportunity to remind China that the world is watching.
We ask not just for diplomatic engagement, but for moral courage. If the UK is to stand for freedom and human dignity, then it must not overlook Tibet in its dealings with China.
Beijing’s economic and political ties with Nepal make life increasingly hard for the 10,000 Tibetans who escaped there.
Xi Jinping meets with Prime Minister of Nepal Pushpa Kamal Dahal Prachanda in 2023. Source: Foreign Ministry of the PRC.
China’s increasing influence in Nepal is no longer just a geopolitical concern—it is a pressing human rights issue that is affecting the lives of the Tibetan refugee community there. This past summer, I spent a month in Nepal and visited Tibetan refugee camps, where I witnessed firsthand the deepening challenges these exiled Tibetans face as Beijing’s grip on the country tightens. What I saw was not just a tale of economic progress, but one of growing repression—disturbingly reminiscent of the conditions Tibetans fled from their homeland over 65 years ago.
One of the most glaring signs of foreign aid in Nepal is the transformation of its infrastructure. Chinese-funded projects, from the arrival of electric buses to the construction of regional airports in Lumbini and Pokhara, are reshaping the country’s landscape and its people’s attitudes to China. While these projects may bring short-term economic benefits, they come at a heavy price: the erosion of Nepal’s sovereignty.
For decades, Nepal has balanced its delicate relationships between India and China. But as Chinese-backed initiatives increase, there is rising concern about Nepal’s long-term independence. Despite the construction of new regional international airports, foreign airlines remain hesitant to use these facilities, largely due to India’s reservations about China’s growing role in Nepal’s internal affairs. With Nepal becoming increasingly reliant on Chinese investments, the country’s foreign policy risks shifting in favour of Beijing—a shift that could have far-reaching consequences for Nepal’s autonomy.
This geopolitical shift has even more serious implications for the dwindling 10,000 Tibetan refugees living in exile in Nepal. Having escaped their homeland after China’s occupation of Tibet, where cultural suppression and persecution still prevail, many now find themselves facing similar restrictions in what was supposed to be a safe haven.
Expressions of Tibetan identity—whether through wearing a “Free Tibet” t-shirt, raising the Tibetan flag, or participating in traditional cultural practices—are being met with growing hostility. During my visit, I learned that local authorities, likely acting under pressure from Chinese interests, have begun restricting Tibetan cultural practices. Events like Gorshey (Tibetan circle dances), once public celebrations of Tibetan heritage, are now forced underground in the Kathmandu Valley. The chilling effect on these cultural activities is a painful echo of the repression that many Tibetans thought they had left behind.
A Tibetan refugee selling traditional handicraft in Nepal. Credits.
Even the deeply symbolic tradition of Lhakar (White Wednesday) is now under threat. A movement that grew out of the 2008 protests in Tibet, Lhakar is a weekly expression of Tibetan pride and identity. Every Wednesday, Tibetans speak their language, wear traditional clothing, and support Tibetan-owned businesses as an act of peaceful cultural resistance. But even these small acts of pride are being curtailed. As China’s influence in Nepal grows, Tibetans are finding it increasingly difficult to gather, celebrate, and maintain their traditions.
What is particularly troubling is the erosion of the very freedoms Tibetan refugees believed they would find in exile. The rights they sought—freedom of expression, freedom from fear, and the ability to preserve their identity—are being undermined. The parallels between the repression they fled in Tibet and the mounting pressure they face in Nepal are becoming too striking to ignore.
This growing threat to the rights of Tibetan refugees must be a matter of global concern. The international community cannot afford to stay silent. China’s expanding influence in Nepal has implications that go beyond mere infrastructure deals—it strikes at the heart of human rights and cultural survival. Tibetan refugees in Nepal have a fundamental right to express their cultural identity, free from persecution or interference.
The time for action is now. Media outlets, human rights organisations, and governments around the world must shine a light on this pressing issue. As China continues to reshape Nepal’s political and social landscape, the global community has a responsibility to ensure that Tibetans in exile can live free from oppression and preserve their rich cultural heritage. Their struggle is not just about one displaced community—it is about defending the universal values of freedom, dignity, and the right to exist as a people.
The fight for Tibetan freedom is far from over. As the founder and chair of the Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities, I call on the international community to stand up for the Tibetan refugees in Nepal and recognise the growing threat posed by China’s influence. Tibetans’ cultural identity and their right to live free from oppression are worth defending—because their fight is a fight for the fundamental human rights we all cherish.
Recent developments in European museums, specifically the Musée du quai Branly and the Musée Guimet in Paris, have sparked controversy over their presentation of Tibet as “Xizang.” This renaming aligns with Beijing’s political narrative, raising concerns about how Western cultural institutions are increasingly vulnerable to external political pressures. The use of “Xizang” is emblematic of China’s international campaign to shape global discourse on Tibet, a campaign driven by the establishment of the Xizang International Communication Centre.
The term “Xizang,” which translates to “Western Treasure House,” is the official Chinese designation for Tibet and is heavily promoted by Beijing to reinforce its sovereignty claims. For years, China has sought international adoption of the term, as part of a broader strategy to control the narrative surrounding Tibet’s history, culture, and political status.
China’s Renewed Global Communication Strategy
Tibet, a landlocked Buddhist region with a rich cultural and religious heritage, has long been at the centre of conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Tibetans view their language, religion, and identity as distinct, while China claims Tibet as an inseparable part of its territory. This narrative became official after China’s 1950 military invasion, which culminated in the full annexation of Tibet following the Dalai Lama’s exile to India in March 1959. In response to China’s aggression, Tibetans resisted, first with poorly-equipped weapons in the 1950s, and later through guerrilla warfare by voluntary fighters operating from Mustang, Nepal from 1960 until 1974. The Central Tibetan Administration, also known as the Tibetan government-in-exile, has called for genuine autonomy for decades, though Beijing has consistently rejected these appeals.
Recently, China launched the Xizang International Communication Centre, a key initiative in its ongoing effort to reshape global perceptions of Tibet. Operating under the Chinese government’s Tibet propaganda apparatus, the centre’s primary goal is to promote Beijing’s preferred version of Tibet’s history and its integration into China. This effort extends beyond domestic propaganda, aiming to influence international media, academia, and cultural institutions by disseminating a narrative aligned with China’s political stance on Tibet.
This communication centre is part of China’s broader strategy to expand its “soft power” and shape global opinions. Through institutions like these, China seeks to redefine international understanding of Tibet, often downplaying Tibetans’ calls for greater autonomy and historical claims to independence. The international adoption of “Xizang” is viewed as a key victory in this campaign.
Musée du quai Branly and Musée Guimet: A Case of Influence
Against this backdrop, two respected Parisian institutions – Musée du quai Branly and Musée Guimet, both renowned for their focus on world cultures – have come under scrutiny for using the term “Xizang” and “Himalayan World” respectively in their exhibits on Tibet. While both museums are respected for their dedication to cultural preservation and education, critics argue that their decision to use “Xizang” reflects undue influence from Beijing, potentially compromising the historical integrity of their displays.
The Musée du quai Branly in Paris (Photo/Branly Museum)
Adopting this terminology is seen by many as an implicit endorsement of China’s political agenda. It risks erasing the distinct cultural and historical identity that Tibetans and their supporters have fought to preserve. By using “Xizang” in place of “Tibet,” these institutions appear to align themselves with China’s narrative, raising concerns about the role of Western museums in maintaining objective representations of global histories.
Facade of Guimet Museum, dressed by Chinese artist Jiang Qiong Er, in central Paris in 2024 (Photo/Miguel Medina/AFP)
The Role of Cultural Institutions in Historical Representation
Museums are powerful custodians of culture, history, and knowledge, playing a crucial role in shaping public understanding. They are often viewed as impartial entities that educate the public on complex historical narratives. However, the cases of Musée du quai Branly and Musée Guimet demonstrate that even cultural institutions are not immune to political influence.
Pressure to align with international diplomatic or economic relationships can lead to decisions that prioritise geopolitical considerations over historical accuracy. The decision to refer to Tibet as “Xizang” may be perceived as a concession to China’s growing global influence, potentially at the expense of Tibet’s distinct identity and history.
This shift is part of a broader trend of Beijing’s expanding political reach into cultural and educational spaces around the world. The controversial Confucius Institutes in various Western countries provide another example of China’s soft power tactics. By influencing how Tibet is represented in prestigious Western institutions, China is gaining ground in its effort to control the international narrative about the region.
The Implications of Political Influence on Cultural Narratives
The consequences of this political influence are significant. For Tibetans and advocates of self-determination, the use of “Xizang” represents more than a simple linguistic change; it symbolises the erasure of their cultural and historical identity. Tibet has a long history of resistance and calls for independence, and the adoption of China’s terminology risks diminishing the visibility of this struggle on the global stage.
Furthermore, the willingness of Western institutions to adopt Beijing’s terminology raises questions about how far cultural organisations are willing to compromise their integrity under external pressure. Museums, which should offer unbiased presentations of history, now risk becoming conduits for state-sponsored narratives.
Conclusion
The decision by Musée du quai Branly and Musée Guimet to use “Xizang” in reference to Tibet underscores the growing political influence that Beijing exerts on global cultural institutions. This shift is occurring against the backdrop of China’s broader efforts, exemplified by the Xizang International Communication Centre, to reshape global discourse surrounding Tibet. As China expands its reach, cultural institutions worldwide face a crucial choice: whether to uphold their commitment to historical accuracy and independence or yield to political influence. This decision will not only impact the representation of Tibet but could also set a precedent for how global narratives are shaped in the future.
*Tsering Passang, London (UK) is the founder and chair of the Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities.
Photo: Geneviève GarrigosPhoto: Geneviève Garrigos(Image source: Phayul – Tibetans in Paris, France protests in front of Musée Guimet on Saturday (Photo/X)
To mark this year’s 75th founding anniversary of the People’s Republic of China, a coalition of UK-based Tibetan, Hong Kong, Southern Mongolia, Taiwanese and Uyghur communities are staging a public protest in London to highlight atrocities being committed in Communist China’s occupied territories. Rights groups and NGOs such as Free Tibet, World Uyghur Congress and Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities, whilst supporting these communities, condemn China’s continued brutal crackdown on human rights defenders in China and its occupied territories.
’75 Years of the CCP, 75 Years of Repression; Oppose the super-Embassy’ of the People’s Republic of China in the UK.
Date: Tuesday, 1st October 2024 | From 6.30pm – 8pm
Venue: Royal Mint Court (in Tower Hamlets), London, EC3 4QN
(Note: The Royal Mint Court in Tower Hamlets is the proposed site of the super-Embassy of the People’s Republic of China).
Speakers will remind the CCP regime and the international community about China’s atrocities being committed in its occupied nations, including in East Turkestan and Tibet.
Please join us, show your support and solidarity with the peoples of East Turkistan, Hong Kong, Southern Mongolia, Taiwan and Tibet.
Delegates from 28 Buddhist centres across nine European countries reaffirmed that the recognition of reincarnations, including Tibet’s spiritual leader – His Holiness the Dalai Lama, should be governed by Tibetan traditions, not by external authorities like Beijing.
The conference also urged the global community to reject any Chinese-appointed spiritual figures, emphasising religious autonomy and calling for solidarity in defending Tibetan Buddhist practices from political interference.
The Fourth Europe Tibetan Buddhism Conference, held in Belgium from September 13-14, 2024, conveyed a clear stance on the Dalai Lama’s reincarnation—a central issue for both Tibetan and Western Buddhists.
7th August 2024, GATPM – By Tsering Passang from Pokhara, Nepal
New avenue paves way for meaningful actions for the Tibetan people after the American Bar Association’s adoption of Resolution 502 on Tibet, the first resolution on Tibet in ABA history.
The ABA House of Delegates, the association’s policymaking body, convened to debate key policy issues at the ABA Annual Meeting in Chicago. Photo Courtesy: American Bar Association (ABA)
A major landmark development for the Tibetan people comes after the American Bar Association (ABA), a body consisting of over 400,000 US lawyers and legal professionals, adopted a resolution on Tibet, on the first day of its Annual General Meeting, held in Chicago, the national headquarters of the ABA, from 5th to 6th August. The policy making body, known as the House of Delegates (HOD), encompasses 590 delegates from ABA entities and state, local and speciality bar associations.
Proposed by the International Law Section (ILS) of the American Bar Association (ABA) to the House of Delegates, the Resolution 502 received a resounding support from the delegates at the AGM with no objections on the 5th of August.
Sara Sandford, Attorney and a former Chair of the ILS, commented: “The American Bar Association stood up for rule of law and protection of human rights when it adopted a resolution urging the United States Department of State Office of Global Criminal Justice to conduct an independent re-evaluation of reported atrocities being committed in Tibet in violation of the People Republic of China’s international obligations. It further calls for the endorsement of a recommendation made by the International Commission of Jurists for a Special Rapporteur to be appointed at the United Nations to further discuss and address the situation in Tibet. With Tibet and its people facing these conditions since the 1950’s it is so important that the ABA stand up and call for urgent action. Time is of the essence.”
Regina M. Paulose, an international criminal law attorney and Co-Chair of the International Criminal Law Committee in ILS said: “We welcome this great news. We look forward to the future actions by the ABA and its entities in promoting dialogue and conversations about the rule of law, justice, and accountability related to Tibet.”
Tsering Passang, Founder and Chair of the Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities (GATPM), said: “I am very delighted by this excellent news of Resolution 502 adopted by the ABA, first on Tibet in its history. This is a new avenue for the Tibetans to pursue justice in the eyes of international laws. We hope that concerned stakeholders, including the UN and the US will pay heed to the ABA’s Resolution 502 and ensure some meaningful actions for Tibetan people, who have been seeking justice for far too long, well over six decades. I take this opportunity to thank the American Bar Association and its members.”
The American Bar Association (ABA) was founded in 1878 on a commitment to set the legal and ethical foundation for the American nation. Today, it exists as a membership organisation and stands committed to its mission of defending liberty and pursuing justice.
In a significant diplomatic development, Mrs. Tsering Yangkey, a seasoned civil servant from the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) in Dharamsala, has been appointed as the new Representative of His Holiness the Dalai Lama to the United Kingdom. This marks the first time in 15 years that a senior Tibetan civil servant from Dharamsala will head the Office of Tibet in London.
The Office of Tibet, responsible for maintaining diplomatic relations with the UK, Ireland, Northern Europe, and the Baltic States, will be under Yangkey’s stewardship as the UK experiences a political shift. This appointment follows the Labour Party’s landslide victory earlier this month under Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, ending the Conservative Party’s 14-year rule.
Mrs. Tsering Yangkey’s new role also signifies a milestone as she becomes the second Tibetan woman diplomat to serve as the Dalai Lama’s Representative to the UK. Her extensive experience within the CTA positions her as an exemplary ambassador for Tibetans in the UK. Tibetans and supporters eagerly anticipate her contributions to the Tibetan cause.
Distinguished Career of Secretary Tsering Yangkey
Born on June 15, 1971, in the Mundgod Tibetan Settlement, South India, Tsering Yangkey began her career with the CTA in 1996 as Under Secretary in the Department of Religion and Culture. Over the years, she has held several key positions:
Deputy Secretary, Department of Religion and Culture (1999)
Joint Secretary, Department of Finance (2007)
Joint Secretary, Department of Health (2008)
Director, Tibetan Institute of Performing Arts (2012)
Additional Secretary, Tibet Policy Institute (2014)
Additional Secretary, Department of Information and International Relations (2016)
Director, Tibet Policy Institute (2018)
Secretary, Tibetan Election and Public Service Commission (2019 – present)
Yangkey’s progression through various departments of the CTA highlights her dedication and multifaceted expertise, making her well-suited for her new diplomatic role in London.
The Tibetan community and their supporters in the UK, Ireland, Northern Europe and the Baltic States look forward to Yangkey’s leadership in fostering stronger diplomatic relations and advancing the cause of Tibetan people’s rights and justice. Her appointment is a testament to the growing recognition and support for Tibetan leadership on the global stage, currently led by Sikyong Penpa Tsering, President of the Central Tibetan Administration.
Congratulations to Tsering Yangkey on her new role as the Representative of His Holiness the Dalai Lama to the UK. Her extensive experience and dedication promise to bring a renewed focus and vigour to the Office of Tibet in London.
Alors que tous les regards sont tournés vers la Palestine et l’Ukraine, je crois que nous commettons la plus grande erreur de l’histoire : oublier ce qui se passe au Tibet.
Le Tibet, une région de l’Himalaya, est un sujet de discorde et de répression sous la domination chinoise depuis des décennies. La politique du gouvernement chinois au Tibet a été marquée par un contrôle strict, une répression culturelle et des violations des droits de l’homme.
La situation au Tibet reste désastreuse, avec une répression continue et des violations des droits humains de la part du gouvernement chinois. Malgré la condamnation internationale, la Chine continue de maintenir un contrôle strict sur la région, supprimant la culture, la religion et l’identité tibétaines. Le sort du peuple tibétain appelle une attention mondiale continue et un plaidoyer en faveur de ses droits et libertés.
Aujourd’hui, j’ai eu le plaisir d’interviewer Tsering Passang. Il est lui-même un réfugié tibétain et le fondateur et président de l’Alliance mondiale pour le Tibet et les minorités persécutées.
Tsering Passang, Founder and Chair, Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities
Pourquoi soutenir le Tibet ?
Le Tibet, historiquement connu pour son identité culturelle et religieuse unique, a conservé une certaine indépendance jusqu’au milieu du XXe siècle. Le tournant s’est produit en 1950 lorsque la nouvelle République populaire de Chine, dirigée par le Parti communiste, a envahi le Tibet. La signature ultérieure de l’Accord en dix-sept points en 1951 visait à garantir l’autonomie tibétaine sous souveraineté chinoise, mais de nombreux Tibétains affirment que l’accord a été contraint et que ses promesses n’ont pas été tenues.
Aujourd’hui, j’ai eu l’honneur de m’entretenir avec Tsering Passang, un pionnier en matière de promotion de la résolution du conflit au Tibet.
Né dans des camps de réfugiés tibétains dans l’ouest du Népal, son père était membre de la guérilla tibétaine basée au Mustang, près de la frontière Népal-Tibet, dans les années 1960 et 1970. Après avoir terminé ses études dans une école pour réfugiés tibétains au Népal et en Inde, il est venu au Royaume-Uni grâce à un programme de bourses. Il a travaillé en étroite collaboration avec les combattants de la résistance tibétaine et a consacré sa vie à défendre les droits des minorités persécutées : “En 2020, j’ai fondé l’Alliance mondiale pour le Tibet et les minorités persécutées, une plateforme pour faire avancer la cause du Tibet en organisant des séminaires et des manifestations pour mettre en lumière les violations des droits de l’homme et les dissidences politiques par la Chine dont sont victimes les communautés persécutées, notamment les Tibétains, les Ouïghours, les Hongkongais et les Mongols du Sud.” Explique Tsering
Tsering Passang nous en dévoile davantage: “Après la fondation de la République populaire de Chine (RPC) le 1er octobre 1949, le sort du peuple tibétain a changé à jamais. La promesse du leader communiste chinois Mao Tsé Toung d’une soi-disant « libération pacifique » du Tibet des impérialistes étrangers a abouti à une invasion militaire illégale à grande échelle des terres bouddhistes pacifiques avec l’assujettissement total du peuple tibétain, qui se poursuit encore aujourd’hui. Plus d’un million de Tibétains ont perdu la vie depuis que la Chine communiste est arrivée au Tibet pour les « libérer ».”
Aujourd’hui, la situation concernant les violations des droits de l’homme au Tibet reste un sujet de grande préoccupation, avec des rapports continus faisant état de répression et de persécution de la part des autorités chinoises. Selon le score de liberté mondiale 2024 de Freedom House, le Tibet arrive en tête des pays/régions les moins libres.
Beaucoup de gens qui ne connaissent pas le Tibet pourraient considérer cela comme un simple cas classique d’impérialisme. Cependant, l’invasion forcée du Tibet par la Chine devrait constituer une préoccupation majeure pour le monde entier.
En laissant la Chine occuper le Tibet, nous permettons l’extinction possible d’une belle culture qui revêt une grande importance pour le bouddhisme. Le Tibet est une terre sainte, et que l’on soit religieux ou non, il est impossible de nier l’importance du bouddhisme. En tant qu’Occidentaux, nous connaissons tous le 14e Dalaï Lama, un chef spirituel qui prône la compassion et la non-violence.
Pourtant, la seule présence de la Chine menace la culture religieuse du Tibet et ses écosystèmes naturels :
“Les autorités chinoises mettent en œuvre des projets de développement à grande échelle au Tibet, notamment le développement d’infrastructures, d’exploitation minière et de barrages hydroélectriques, sans consultation ni consentement des communautés tibétaines locales.
Ces projets conduisent souvent à des réinstallations forcées, à des confiscations de terres, à des atteintes à l’environnement, la dégradation et la perturbation des moyens de subsistance traditionnels. Le dernier projet de barrage controversé dans le comté de Dege, à l’est du Tibet, submergera les monastères bouddhistes tibétains et 50 villages et déplacera près de 100 000 personnes. Les monastères tibétains menacés de destruction sont ceux de Wonto (Wangdui), Tashi, Gonsar, Yena (Yinnan), Rabten et Khardho.
Le monastère de Wonto et ses anciennes peintures murales remontent au 14ème et 15ème siècle.” ajoute-t-il
Pourquoi un Occidental s’en soucierait-il ? Ces valeurs que nous avons mentionnées ont valu au Dalaï Lama un prix Nobel, mais ont globalement contribué à rendre le monde meilleur. L’intégration des valeurs bouddhistes et du cadre du Dalaï Lama dans notre monde a contribué à repousser les limites de la médecine occidentale, de l’éducation et des droits de l’homme.
Par exemple, grâce à l’inclusion de la méditation dans la médecine, pratique promue par les bouddhistes comme moyen d’atteindre l’illumination, des études ont montré des taux de rémission extrêmes pour des maladies que les médicaments à eux seuls ne pouvaient guérir.
L’étude 2020 de l’Institut national de la santé montre que plus de 51 % des patients atteints de cancer qui ont mis en œuvre la méditation via une application ont ensuite été déclarés indemnes de cancer.
Le Tibet possède également certains des arts les plus fascinants au monde, qui sont également liés à leurs croyances religieuses.
Les thangkas sont des peintures complexes en forme de rouleaux sur coton ou soie, représentant souvent des divinités bouddhistes, des scènes de la vie du Bouddha, des mandalas ou des chefs spirituels comme le Dalaï Lama. Ces peintures portatives servent à la fois d’outils pédagogiques et d’aides à la méditation, ce qui les rend indispensables à la pratique religieuse tibétaine.
Si vous n’êtes pas convaincu de l’importance de l’art tibétain, je vous invite à revisiter « Avatar, le dernier maître de l’air », une émission télévisée qui a captivé des millions de téléspectateurs et qui s’inspire grandement de la culture tibétaine, en particulier de son architecture, ses valeurs monastiques, et la promotion de la paix.
Songer au fait qu’une série à succès occidentale serait presque entièrement basée sur la culture tibétaine vous donnerait une idée de la richesse de l’art et de la culture de ce pays.
Et pourtant, une fois de plus, détruire l’identité du Tibet est un objectif fixé par la Chine :
“Les politiques chinoises favorisent l’assimilation de la culture tibétaine à la culture chinoise à majorité ethnique Han. Ces politiques comprennent l’imposition du mandarin comme langue principale d’enseignement dans les écoles, la marginalisation de la langue tibétaine et la promotion d’une propagande chinoise qui porte atteinte à l’identité culturelle tibétaine. La mise en œuvre de l’admission forcée de près d’un million d’enfants tibétains dans des internats coloniaux à la chinoise depuis l’arrivée au pouvoir de Xi Jinping est un sujet de grande préoccupation, qui, selon nous, est une stratégie à long terme visant à annihiler l’identité, la langue, la culture et la culture tibétaines ainsi que son Histoire.” insiste Tsering.
Les implications sur les droits de l’homme dans notre oubli du Tibet
Les cyniques diront que de nombreuses cultures vivent et meurent et que le Tibet ne fait pas exception.
Cependant, le problème au Tibet n’est pas seulement la mort d’une culture, mais aussi le fait que la répression chinoise contre le Tibet est inhumaine.
“L’une des plus grandes préoccupations concernant le Tibet à l’heure actuelle est la répression continue et les violations des droits de l’homme auxquelles le peuple tibétain est confronté. Malgré l’attention internationale et les efforts de sensibilisation, les autorités chinoises continuent d’appliquer des politiques intrusives qui restreignent la liberté de religion, d’expression et de réunion, ainsi que les droits culturels et linguistiques. Les informations faisant état de détentions arbitraires, de torture, de réinstallations forcées et de dégradation de l’environnement au Tibet sont profondément troublantes et soulignent le besoin urgent d’agir pour remédier à ces abus systémiques.“explique Tsering Passang
En février de cette année, il y a eu une exposition au Tibet sur l’auto-immolation promue par l’Administration centrale tibétaine. Nous avons tous entendu parler de cette façon brutale de mourir. S’auto-immoler est une façon pour les Tibétains de montrer aux impérialistes chinois qu’ils ne peuvent pas rester sur cette terre si elle doit être piétinée par les autorités étrangères.
L’auto-immolation de Jamphel Yeshi était l’un des cas les plus médiatisés parmi plus de 150 actes similaires commis par des Tibétains depuis 2009, tous pour protester contre la domination chinoise. Son acte a apporté une couverture médiatique importante et une attention internationale à la cause tibétaine.
Il y a eu des centaines d’auto-immolations au Tibet depuis celle-ci, notamment le chanteur tibétain de 25 ans Tsewang Norbu qui s’est auto-immolé en 2022 et il semble que la communauté internationale n’en parle pas beaucoup.
Au-delà de leur propre mort, les Tibétains sont injustement arrêtés, pourchassés sans arrêt et meurent dans des conditions suspectes.
Passang a partagé une histoire très poignante sur un tel cas :
“Tulku Tenzin Delek Rinpoché, un leader bouddhiste tibétain vénéré, était connu pour ses efforts visant à promouvoir la culture tibétaine, l’éducation et la conservation de l’environnement à Lithang, dans l’est du Tibet.
Cependant, son activisme a fait de lui une cible des autorités chinoises, qui l’ont accusé d’être impliqué dans un attentat à la bombe en 2002, accusations qu’il a niées avec véhémence.
Malgré les appels internationaux réclamant sa libération et les inquiétudes concernant son état de santé, Tulku Tenzin Delek Rinpoché a été condamné à mort en 2002. Son procès a été largement critiqué pour son iniquité et son manque de transparence. Suite aux pressions intenses exercées par les organisations de défense des droits humains et les gouvernements, sa peine a ensuite été commuée en réclusion à perpétuité. Cependant, il est resté incarcéré dans des conditions difficiles et sa santé s’est rapidement détériorée.
Les efforts pour obtenir sa libération se sont poursuivis pendant des années, des militants du monde entier luttant pour la justice et soulignant son cas comme emblématique des problèmes plus larges auxquels sont confrontés les Tibétains sous la domination chinoise. Malgré ces efforts, Tulku Tenzin Delek Rinpoché est décédé tragiquement en prison en 2015 dans des circonstances suspectes, suscitant l’indignation et de nouveaux appels à la responsabilisation.”
Cette histoire montre que les Tibétains ne sont même pas autorisés à parler de ce qui se passe au Tibet. À moins qu’ils ne soient prêts à risquer la prison :
“Les Tibétains détenus en raison de leurs convictions politiques ou religieuses risquent d’être torturés, maltraités et privés du droit à une procédure régulière.
Des rapports indiquent que les détenus tibétains sont soumis à des coups, à des décharges électriques et à du stress chronique, et d’autres formes de torture pour obtenir des aveux ou faire taire la dissidence.
Les avocats chinois qui veulent aider les Tibétains dans leurs représentations juridiques sont mis à l’écart ou bien on les menace de leur enlever leur permis de séjour s’ils continuent à aider les Tibétains.”
Ils sont très efficacement réduits au silence par le gouvernement chinois, qui charge régulièrement des fonctionnaires de « visiter » les foyers tibétains et de surveiller les familles de très près.
Cela rend toute personne susceptible d’être jetée en prison si le gouvernement estime qu’elle est contre la domination chinoise.
Lancée vers 2011, la campagne « Solidifier les fondations » vise à renforcer le contrôle du Parti communiste chinois (PCC) sur la société tibétaine. Cette campagne vise à éliminer la dissidence, à promouvoir la loyauté envers le parti et à assurer la stabilité dans la région. L’un des éléments essentiels de cette initiative est le programme de « séjour chez l’habitant », dans le cadre duquel des cadres du gouvernement, souvent des Chinois Han, sont envoyés vivre avec des familles tibétaines pendant de longues périodes.
Les employés du gouvernement s’engagent également dans l’éducation politique, enseignant aux familles les politiques du PCC et l’importance de la loyauté envers le parti. Ils distribuent du matériel de propagande et encouragent la participation aux activités du PCC, visant à endoctriner les Tibétains avec l’idéologie du parti communiste chinois.
Il s’agit d’une atteinte massive à la vie privée, mais ce n’est pas le seul outil de l’arsenal chinois.
“Les Tibétains sont confrontés à d’importants obstacles pour voyager, tant au Tibet qu’à l’étranger. Les autorités chinoises exigent que les Tibétains obtiennent un permis pour voyager en dehors de leur zone locale, et ceux perçus comme politiquement sensibles se voient souvent refuser l’autorisation de voyager. Cependant, les Chinois Han de Chine continentale peuvent voyager librement à travers n’importe quelle partie du Tibet sans restrictions.” commente Tsering Passang, démontrant que les Tibétains ne sont pas en sécurité à tout moment et ne peuvent pas fuir le pays aussi facilement que vous et moi pourrions nous rendre à l’aéroport.
La réponse de la communauté internationale face à ce qui se passe au Tibet est largement insuffisante.
Au cours de cet entretien, je sens que Tsering Passang est reconnaissant du soutien offert par la communauté internationale, mais en tant qu’Occidentale moi-même, je trouve que nous pourrions faire bien plus, mais nous avons choisi de ne pas le faire afin de préserver l’économie. relations avec la Chine.
Il semble que Tsering Passang soit d’accord avec mon sentiment selon lequel les pays occidentaux donnent la priorité à leurs relations économiques avec la Chine plutôt qu’à la survie du Tibet :
“Certains observateurs affirment que l’engagement économique de la communauté internationale avec la Chine a donné la priorité au commerce et aux investissements plutôt qu’aux préoccupations en matière de droits de l’homme, ce qui a conduit à une réticence à défier la Chine sur les questions liées au Tibet.“
L’influence économique croissante de la Chine et son rôle de puissance économique mondiale ont compliqué les efforts visant à lutter contre les violations des droits de l’homme au Tibet.
Ce qui est surprenant, c’est que l’Amérique et l’Europe tentent activement de faire pression contre la Chine sans s’attaquer à l’une des plus grandes violations des droits de l’homme qui se produisent dans le monde.
Tsering Passang voit comment la communauté internationale pourrait réagir de manière plus proactive – pour eux et pour le Tibet : “Personnellement, je souhaite et j’exhorte l’Inde et le Royaume-Uni à exercer leurs liens historiques avec le Tibet indépendant, avant l’invasion du Tibet par la Chine communiste, et soulever la question du Tibet au plus haut niveau afin de trouver une solution politique significative et durable au conflit sino-tibetais. J’espère que New Delhi et Londres créeront un groupe de travail spécial et travailleront en étroite collaboration avec Washington DC, Bruxelles et d’autres partenaires de premier plan dans le monde pour restaurer le Tibet en tant qu’État tampon entre la Chine et l’Inde dans le but d’assurer la paix et la stabilité dans la région himalayenne.” Il avoue.
Alors que la Chine prend davantage de contrôle sur les marchés occidentaux et s’implante en Afrique, il est difficile de dire dans quelle mesure les représailles et le soutien occidentaux envers le Tibet sont possibles.
Tsering Passang partage l’espoir d’un avenir meilleur pour le Tibet.
Entre autres choses, il souhaite une véritable autonomie pour le peuple tibétain, un “dialogue significatif ” pour aider à accélérer la résolution entre la Chine et le Tibet, une justice face à la “détention arbitraire, la torture, les déplacements forcés et les restrictions sur les relations entre la Chine et le Tibet“.
Dans mon cas, je souhaite mettre à profit ma vie pour écrire le plus possible sur des gens comme Tsering Passang, qui militent pour la liberté d’un pays oublié de l’Europe. J’aimerais voir les gens en savoir plus sur le Tibet et s’engager dans cette cause car elle tourne autour de la protection de ce qui compte pour nous tous, en particulier pour les Tibétains : l’harmonie.
Suzanne Latre est la rédactrice en chef du Parisien Matin. Elle est une romancière publiée avec une formation en politique, diplomatie et droit. Elle est spécialiste des relations européennes et porte un intérêt particulier aux affaires irlandaises et françaises. Elle est également directrice de Spokz People, une organisation qui soutient le bien-être des personnes handicapées.
18th June 2024 / Dharamshala: A high-level bipartisan delegation from the United States visited the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) and met with Tibetan leadership today on the eve of their much-anticipated meeting with His Holiness the Dalai Lama.
Tibetans receiving the delegation in traditional style at the Kangra Airport. Photo / Tenzin Phende / CTA
Rep. Michael McCaul, the Chairman of House Foreign Affairs Committee, led the delegation that comprises Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Speaker Emerita; Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA), House Veterans Affairs Committee; Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY), Ranking Member, House Foreign Affairs Committee; Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY), House Ways and Means Committee; Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA), House Rules Committee; and Rep. Ami Bera (D-CA), House Foreign Affairs Committee. The delegation was accompanied by their family members and staff.
Upon arrival at Kangra Airport, members of the U.S. delegation were accorded a warm welcome reception by Kalon (Minister) Norzin Dolma of the Department of Information & International Relations (DIIR) and her aides made up of Secretary Karma Choeying, Representative Dr Namgyal Choedup from the Washington-based Office of Tibet, Secretary of the Bureau of His Holiness the Dalai Lama in New Delhi Dhondup Gyalpo, Dharamshala Tibetan Settlement Officer Kunchok Migmar, and CTA’s Protocol Officer Tenzin Paljor.
Rep. Michael McCaul, the Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, speaking to the media.
Speaking to the media at the Airport, Congressman McCaul said, “We are very excited to see His Holiness tomorrow to talk about many things, including the bill that just passed out of Congress that basically says that the United States of America stands with the people of Tibet.” The Representative further assured that the bill would be signed by POTUS when the media asked.
In addition, to honour their dedicated support and commitment to finding solutions to the longstanding Tibet-China conflict, a throng of Tibetan residents, including young students and members of various NGOs, lined both sides of the road before the Hyatt Regency hotel to warmly greet the visiting U.S. legislators.
The delegation then stopped at Gangchen Kyishong to tour CTA premises following a short stay at the hotel, where they briefly met with CTA leadership, namely Sikyong Penpa Tsering, Speaker Khenpo Sonam Tenphel, Tibetan Justice Commissioner Tenzin Lungtok, Deputy Speaker Dolma Tsering Teykhang, Education Kalon Tharlam Dolma, Security Kalon Dolma Gyari, DIIR Kalon Norzin Dolma, Election & Public Service Commissioner Wangdu Tsering Pesur, Standing Committee Members of the Tibetan Parliament in Exile, and Secretaries of CTA Departments and Offices.
As part of their visitation programme at CTA, the delegation visited the Tibetan Parliament in Exile and the Tibet Museum.
Later in the evening, CTA will host a dinner reception at the Tibetan Institute of Performing Arts (TIPA) in honour of the visiting lawmakers from the United States.
Speaker Khenpo Sonam Tenphel presenting a ceremonial scarf to Rep. Michael McCaul, the Chairman of House Foreign Affairs Committee.Sikyong Penpa Tsering interacting with Rep. Michael McCaul, the Chairman of House Foreign Affairs Committee, during the reception.Tibetan Justice Commissioner Tenzin Lungtok presenting ceremonial scarf to a member of the delegation.
The 2024 Lok Sabha elections in India have concluded with significant outcomes. Here’s a comprehensive analysis by renowned Political Strategist, Psephologists, Dr. Bhushan Jadhav PHD Political Science MBA Finance.
Election Overview:
The elections saw a high voter turnout across the country, conducted in seven phases. A notable increase in millionaire candidates was observed, with 93% of the winning candidates being MILLIONAIRE.
The BJP secured 240 seats, falling short of the majority mark of 272, indicating a need for coalition support.
The Congress and other parties forming the INDIA bloc showed a strong performance, securing 233 seats.
State-Wise Results and Statistics:
Uttar Pradesh (UP): The BJP’s seat count in UP fell from 64 in 2019 to 33, while the Samajwadi Party emerged as a significant player, winning 43 seats.
Maharashtra: The MVA (Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi) showed an advantage, indicating effective collaboration among Congress, Uddhav Thackeray, and Sharad Pawar.
West Bengal: Mamata Banerjee successfully defended her stronghold, with her party securing 30 seats.
Tamil Nadu: The state witnessed a complete sweep by the opposition, with 39 seats going to the INDIA bloc.
Analysis of Political Dynamics:
The rural vote played a crucial role, with the BJP losing a third of its rural constituencies, reflecting discontent over jobs and inflation.
Economic Impact: The stock market showed a record high performance as exit polls triggered optimism, but the final results led to a more cautious approach.
Alliances: The BJP’s reliance on allies like the TDP and JD(U) has become more pronounced, with these parties pressing for significant roles such as the Speaker of the Lok Sabha.
Key Takeaways:
The election results indicate a shift in the political landscape, with the BJP needing to form a coalition government.
The rise of the INDIA bloc suggests a growing demand for change and accountability.
Economic concerns, particularly in rural areas, have significantly influenced the election outcomes.
This analysis provides a snapshot of the current political scenario post the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, reflecting the complexities and dynamics of India’s democracy.
Internal Security Challenges: India’s internal security landscape is complex, influenced by both external and domestic factors. The country faces various challenges such as:
Insurgencies: Persistent insurgencies in regions like Jammu and Kashmir, the Northeast, and Central India pose significant threats.
Cross-border Terrorism: There is an ongoing concern about cross-border terrorism, particularly from neighboring countries like Pakistan.
Cybersecurity: With rapid digitization, cybersecurity has become a critical area, with threats of cyber-attacks, espionage, and data theft.
Organized Crime: Issues like human trafficking, drug trafficking, and organized crime continue to challenge law enforcement agencies.
Foreign Policy Challenges: India’s foreign policy is navigating a dynamic global environment with several challenges:
Geopolitical Tensions: Ongoing conflicts like the Russia-Ukraine war and Israel-Hamas tensions impact India’s foreign policy decisions.
China’s Assertiveness: The rise and assertiveness of China remain the most significant external challenge, affecting India’s strategic and border policies.
India’s Geopolitical Strategy: Navigating the Dragon’s Ascent
In the intricate chessboard of global geopolitics, India finds itself at a crossroads, particularly in its approach to China’s rising assertiveness and the delicate situation with Taiwan. The BJP-led NDA coalition government, freshly mandated in 2024, stands before a multifaceted challenge that will test its diplomatic acumen and strategic foresight.
The Dragon’s Shadow: China’s Growing Dominance
China’s ascendancy in the international arena has been marked by a blend of economic prowess and military might, casting a long shadow over the Indo-Pacific region. The new Indian government must tread a path that balances assertiveness with pragmatism.
Border Disputes: The Perennial Thorn
The India-China border dispute remains a thorny issue, with sporadic tensions flaring up along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). The government’s strategy seems to be one of strengthening crisis management mechanisms and creating buffer zones to prevent skirmishes from escalating. The emphasis on diplomatic dialogue and military disengagement suggests a preference for peaceful resolution, albeit backed by a readiness to defend territorial integrity.
Conclusion: Charting a Course Amidst Turbulent Waters
The BJP-led NDA government’s handling of China’s dominance and aggression, its nuanced policy towards Taiwan, and the approach to the border dispute will be pivotal in shaping India’s geopolitical destiny. The path ahead is fraught with challenges, but also ripe with opportunities to affirm India’s position as a major player on the world stage. The government’s ability to navigate these complex dynamics with a blend of strategic patience and proactive diplomacy will determine the success of its foreign policy in the years to come.
Global Alliances: Balancing relationships with major powers and forming strategic alliances are crucial for India’s global positioning.
BJP NDA Government’s Approach: The BJP-led NDA government aims to address these challenges through various policies and initiatives:
Economic Growth: The government’s focus on making India the third-largest economy by 2027 and strengthening economic resilience.
UNSC Membership: Pursuing permanent membership in the United Nations Security Council is a key foreign policy goal.
Security Reforms: Emphasis on counterterrorism measures and modernizing the military and security infrastructure to deal with internal and external threats.
In conclusion, India’s path ahead is marked by a mix of traditional and non-traditional security challenges. The BJP-led NDA government’s policies are expected to focus on economic growth, strategic alliances, and security reforms to navigate these challenges effectively. The government’s ability to balance domestic security concerns with its foreign policy ambitions will be critical in determining India’s future trajectory on the global stage.
The political landscape of India has seen a significant transformation from the BJP’s solo majority in 2014 and 2019 to the coalition dynamics of the NDA government in 2024. Here’s the differences:
2014 & 2019: The Era of BJP’s Dominance
In 2014, the BJP emerged as a formidable force, securing a majority on its own with 282 seats, marking the end of unstable coalition governments. This victory was attributed to a wave of support for Narendra Modi’s leadership and his promise of economic reform and good governance. The party replicated its success in 2019, crossing the majority mark with 303 seats, reinforcing its position and the public’s faith in its policies.
2024: The Coalition Compromise
The 2024 general elections have painted a different picture. Despite winning the elections, the BJP-led NDA’s victory feels like a defeat due to the reduced number of seats compared to previous years. The BJP managed to secure only 240 seats, necessitating a coalition with the NDA to form the government. This outcome reflects a shift in voter sentiment and suggests a desire for a more inclusive and diverse government.
Key Differences Between the Governments
Majority vs. Coalition: The BJP’s standalone majority in 2014 and 2019 provided a strong mandate, allowing for decisive policymaking. In contrast, the 2024 coalition will require consensus and compromise, potentially leading to more moderate and inclusive policies.
Policy Implementation: A strong BJP government had the liberty to implement policies with relative ease. The NDA coalition might face challenges in policy implementation due to differing ideologies and priorities among alliance partners.
Foreign Policy: The BJP’s robust approach to foreign policy might see adjustments as the coalition government balances the diverse perspectives of its partners, especially concerning sensitive issues like relations with neighboring countries.
Economic Reforms: Economic reforms that were aggressively pursued by the BJP might see a slower pace or a different direction as the coalition government seeks to accommodate the economic visions of its constituent parties.
Impact of Elections on the Indian Stock Market
The recent elections have had a noticeable impact on the Indian stock market. After the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) secured a narrow victory, the stock market experienced its most significant drop since 2020. This reaction was attributed to the BJP losing its parliamentary majority, which has led to a coalition government. Despite this initial reaction, the market’s performance is closely tied to the broader economic policies and stability that the new government will pursue.
The question of India’s emergence as a superpower and its position among the top three economies globally is multifaceted, involving economic growth, political stability, and geopolitical dynamics.
India’s Economic Trajectory
India’s economy has shown remarkable resilience and growth, outpacing other major economies. It surpassed the UK as the fifth-largest economy and is projected to overtake Japan and Germany to reach the third spot by 2027. This growth is driven by a combination of factors, including a digital revolution, infrastructure development, and policy reforms. However, challenges such as unbalanced growth and unrealized demographic potential remain.
Political Landscape Post-Elections
The recent elections have resulted in a coalition government, which may affect the pace and implementation of economic policies. While the BJP remains the largest party, it will need to navigate coalition politics, which could introduce complexities in decision-making and policy execution. This political shift could impact investor confidence and the execution of reforms necessary for India to achieve its economic ambitions.
Superpower Status and Global Ranking
The notion of India becoming a superpower is supported by its economic indicators and global analysts’ predictions. Goldman Sachs has forecasted that India could become the world’s second-largest economy by 2075, and other projections suggest its purchasing power could surpass that of the U.S. by 2050. These predictions underscore India’s potential, but they also highlight the long-term nature of such a transformation.
Impact of Election Results
The ‘shock’ election results have been interpreted as a win for democracy but also as a setback for the Modi government’s strong mandate. The results have reaffirmed the unpredictable nature of Indian politics and the resilience of its democracy. While the BJP’s reduced majority could complicate its economic agenda, it is not necessarily a derailment of India’s path to becoming a superpower.
Conclusion
India’s potential to emerge as a superpower and one of the top three economies is evident from its current growth trajectory and the optimistic forecasts by global analysts. However, the recent election results have introduced a new element of uncertainty. The coalition government will need to maintain political stability and continue pushing for economic reforms to realize this potential. The journey to superpower status is a long-term process, and while the recent political developments may pose challenges, they do not negate India’s upward economic trend and its prospects on the international stage. The key will be how effectively the new government can navigate these challenges and capitalize on India’s inherent strengths.
Dr. Bhushan Jadhav
This is a comprehensive analysis of the 2024 Indian Election Results by renowned Political Strategist, Psephologists, Dr. Bhushan Jadhav PHD Political Science MBA Finance.
You must be logged in to post a comment.